Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777125›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023

CT and MRI as Diagnostic and Management Decision Tools for First Time Lateral Patellar Dislocations: A Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study.

Shahar Dekel, Iris Eshed, Sagie Haziza, Shay Tenenbaum, Ran Thein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shahar Dekel *Department of Internal Medicine D, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Iris Eshed *Department of Radiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sagie HazizaSackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shay TenenbaumDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ran TheinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Following first-time lateral patellar dislocation (FTLPD), most patients are treated conservatively, although 50% of patients will have recurrent dislocations. Typically, radiographs followed by CT and/or MRI are used to assist the clinician in determining treatment strategy and, combined with clinical findings, intraarticular free bodies (CT/MRI), significant medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) tear (MRI) and lateral displacement of the patella (CT) form relative indications for surgery. Methods: Radiographs, MRI and CT knee studies of 34 patients after lateral patellar dislocation (26 FTLPD) were evaluated for intraarticular free bodies, patellar/trochlear fracture, lateral femoral condyle compression, MPFL tear, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and surgery indications. Free bodies and fractures were also evaluated on knee radiographs. FTLPD was analyzed as a subgroup. Surgical indications were compared between imaging modalities. Results: Among FTLPD (26 patients); free bodies were identified in 13 and 19 patients using MRI and CT respectively, compared with 5 patients on radiographs; this was statistically significant. In 8 cases surgery was indicated based on MPFL tear (MRI) combined with lateral patellar displacement (CT). When MRI and CT results were combined, 21 of 26 patients had imaging indications for surgery compared to 13 and 19 patients based on the MRI or CT alone, respectively.CT was statistically better than MRI alone or MRI with radiographs in identifying patients requiring surgery. Conclusion: An MRI or CT study is warranted to determine the need for surgery. A second imaging study (different from the first) should be considered, if surgical indication was not established from the initial study or clinical presentation.

Indexed as

Computed tomography (CT)Lateral patellar dislocationMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Patellar dislocation

Identifiers

PMID36777125
PMCPMC9880121
OpenAlexW4313432868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.