Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777102›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2023

Implementation of the SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) performance assessment tool in the emergency department: A pilot study.

Mary R C Haas, Mallory G Davis, Carrie E Harvey, Rob Huang, Kirstin W Scott, Brian C George, Gregory M Wnuk, John Burkhardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mary R C HaasDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9506-5928
Mallory G DavisDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-7696
Carrie E HarveyDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6467-2098
Rob HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-473X
Kirstin W ScottUniversity of Michigan Emergency Medicine Residency Program Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Brian C GeorgeCenter for Surgical Training and Research, Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Gregory M WnukCenter for Surgical Training and Research, Department of Surgery University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
John BurkhardtDepartments of Emergency Medicine and Learning Health Sciences University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6273-8762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Feedback and assessment are difficult to provide in the emergency department (ED) setting despite their critical importance for competency-based education, and traditional end-of-shift evaluations (ESEs) alone may be inadequate. The SIMPL (Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning) mobile application has been successfully implemented and studied in the operative setting for surgical training programs as a point-of-care tool that incorporates three assessment scales in addition to dictated feedback. SIMPL may represent a viable tool for enhancing workplace-based feedback and assessment in emergency medicine (EM). Methods: We implemented SIMPL at a 4-year EM residency program during a pilot study from March to June 2021 for observable activities such as medical resuscitations and related procedures. Faculty and residents underwent formal rater training prior to launch and were asked to complete surveys regarding the SIMPL app's content, usability, and future directions at the end of the pilot. Results: A total of 36/58 (62%) of faculty completed at least one evaluation, for a total of 190 evaluations and an average of three evaluations per faculty. Faculty initiated 130/190 (68%) and residents initiated 60/190 (32%) evaluations. Ninety-one percent included dictated feedback. A total of 45/54 (83%) residents received at least one evaluation, with an average of 3.5 evaluations per resident. Residents generally agreed that SIMPL increased the quality of feedback received and that they valued dictated feedback. Residents generally did not value the numerical feedback provided from SIMPL. Relative to the residents, faculty overall responded more positively toward SIMPL. The pilot generated several suggestions to inform the optimization of the next version of SIMPL for EM training programs. Conclusions: The SIMPL app, originally developed for use in surgical training programs, can be implemented for use in EM residency programs, has positive support from faculty, and may provide important adjunct information beyond current ESEs.

Indexed as

assessmentcompetency‐based medical educationdirect observationemergency medicine educationfeedbackgraduate medical educationmobile applicationsresidencysmartphonetechnology‐enhanced education

Identifiers

PMID36777102
PMCPMC9899600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.