Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777101›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2023

Trends in emergency medicine resident procedural reporting over a 10-year period.

Michael Gottlieb, Jaime Jordan, Sara Krzyzaniak, Alexandra Mannix, Andrew King, Robert Cooney, Megan Fix, Eric Shappell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael GottliebDepartment of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-8375
Jaime JordanDepartment of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6573-7041
Sara KrzyzaniakDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8173-2750
Alexandra MannixDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-3339
Andrew KingDepartment of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-2268
Robert CooneyDepartment of Emergency Medicine Geisinger Medical Center Danville Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0665-0154
Megan FixDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Utah Hospital Salt Lake City Utah USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4380-1273
Eric ShappellDepartment of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-3219

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Procedural competency is expected of all emergency medicine (EM) residents upon graduation. The ACGME requires a minimum number of essential procedures to successfully complete training. However, data are limited on the actual number of procedures residents perform and prior studies are limited to single institutions over short time periods. This study sought to assess the number of Key Index Procedures completed during EM residency training and evaluate trends over time. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of graduating EM resident procedure logs across eight ACGME accredited residency programs over the last 10 years (2013-2022). Sites were selected to ensure diversity of program length, program type, and geography. All data from EM residents graduating in 2013-2022 were eligible for inclusion. Data from residents from combined training programs, those who did not complete their full training at that institution (i.e., transferred in/out), or those who did not have data available were excluded. We determined the list of procedures based upon the ACGME Key Index Procedures list. Sites obtained totals for each of the identified procedures for each resident upon graduation. We calculated the mean and 95% CI for each procedure. Results: We collected data from a total of 914 residents, with 881 (96.4%) meeting inclusion criteria. The most common procedures were point-of-care ultrasound, adult medical resuscitation, adult trauma resuscitation, and intubation. The least frequent procedures included pericardiocentesis, cricothyroidotomy, cardiac pacing, vaginal delivery, and chest tubes. Most procedures were stable over time with the exception of lumbar punctures (decreased) and point-of-care ultrasound (increased). Conclusions: In a national sample of EM programs, procedural numbers remained stable except for lumbar puncture and ultrasound. This information can inform residency training curricula and accreditation requirements.

Identifiers

PMID36777101
PMCPMC9899625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.