Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36777030›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Peipei An, Li Li, Pei Huang, Yin Zheng, Zekun Jin, Sameh A Korma, Namei Ren, Nan Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peipei AnDepartment of Food Science, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Li LiDepartment of Food Science, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Pei HuangDepartment of Data Science, School of Software Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yin ZhengDepartment of Food Science, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Zekun JinDepartment of Food Science, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Sameh A KormaDepartment of Food Science, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Namei RenDepartment of Food Science, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Nan ZhangDepartment of Food Science, School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, consumers are increasingly concerned about the contamination of food by molds and the addition of chemical preservatives. As natural and beneficial bacteria, probiotics are a prospective alternative in food conservation because of their antimycotic activities, although the mechanism has not been explained fully at the level of metabolites. This study aimed at investigating the antifungal activities and their mechanisms of five potential probiotic strains (

Indexed as

antifungal mechanismgene expressionPenicillium roquefortiprobioticstoxin inhibitionUHPLC-QTOF-MS 2

Identifiers

PMID36777030
PMCPMC9909597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.