ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Characterization and comparative genomics analysis of RepA_N multi-resistance plasmids carrying
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic and Pathogenic Characterization of an Extensively Drug-Resistant Avian PathogenicTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Research Advances on the Impact of Gut Microbiota on COPD: Exploring New Perspectives on the Microbiota-Gut-Lung Axis.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Selection and maintenance of mobile linezolid-resistance genes and plasmids carrying them in the presence of florfenicol, an animal-specific antimicrobial.Access microbiology · 2025Article
- Genomic diversity, antibiotic resistance, and virulence in South African Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus lactis isolates.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Effect of TraN key residues involved in DNA binding on pIP501 transfer rates inFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Multifunctionally disordered TiOTheranostics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This research aimed to investigate the antibiotic resistance of Method: A total of 226 Results: The antibiotic resistance rate of 226 isolates to nearly 57% (8/14) of commonly used antibiotics was higher than 50%. The resistance rate of tiamulin was highest (98.23%), that of tilmicosin, erythromycin, tetracycline and florfenicol was higher than 80%, and that of oxazolidone antibiotic linezolid was 38.49%. The overall antibiotics resistance in Hangzhou, Quzhou and Jinhua was more serious than that in the coastal cities of Ningbo and Wenzhou. The result of PCR showed that Discussion: This study can provide theoretical basis for ensuring the quality and safety of food of animal origin, and provide scientific guidance for slowing down the development of multi-antibiotic resistant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.