Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776992›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2023

Engaging Stigmatised Communities in Australia with Digital Health Systems: Towards Data Justice in Public Health.

Anthony K J Smith, Mark D M Davis, James MacGibbon, Timothy R Broady, Jeanne Ellard, John Rule, Teddy Cook, Elizabeth Duck-Chong, Martin Holt, Christy E Newman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anthony K J SmithCentre for Social Research in Health (CSRH), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-9542
Mark D M DavisSchool of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-0466
James MacGibbonCentre for Social Research in Health (CSRH), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1359-9572
Timothy R BroadyCentre for Social Research in Health (CSRH), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-1868
Jeanne EllardAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0213-3010
John RuleNational Association of People With HIV Australia, Newtown, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7518-7744
Teddy CookACON, Surry Hills, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5741-6013
Elizabeth Duck-ChongSydney, Australia.
Martin HoltCentre for Social Research in Health (CSRH), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-8274
Christy E NewmanCentre for Social Research in Health (CSRH), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5482-2822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In 2018, following government policy changes to Australia's national electronic health record system, 'My Health Record', consumer advocates-including organisations representing people living with HIV, people who use drugs and sex workers-raised concerns about privacy and data security. Responding to these controversies, this study explores the practical, ethical and political complexities of engaging stigmatised communities with digital health systems. Methods: We conducted 16 qualitative semi-structured interviews in 2020 with key informants representing communities who experience stigma, discrimination and marginalisation in Australia. These communities included people living with HIV, sex workers, people who inject drugs, gay and bisexual men and transgender and gender diverse people. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Key informants were sceptical of proposed benefits of electronic health records for their communities, and concerned about privacy risks and the potential for discrimination. Meaningful consultation, consent mechanisms and tackling structural stigma were raised as solutions for engaging communities. Conclusions: Although communities could benefit from being included in digital health systems, significant cultural, legal and social reforms from government were believed to be necessary to build trust in digital health systems. We argue that these forms of data justice are necessary for effective future systems. Policy Implications: Engaging stigmatised communities-including in relation to gender, sexuality, sex work, drug use, HIV-requires a commitment to data justice. The design and implementation of digital health systems requires investment in ongoing and meaningful consultation with communities and representative organisations.

Indexed as

ConsentDataficationData justiceElectronic health recordsPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID36776992
PMCPMC9900552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.