ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2023
Engaging Stigmatised Communities in Australia with Digital Health Systems: Towards Data Justice in Public Health.
Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moving from In-Person to Digital Delivery Models of HIV Peer Support Services in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Digital and data capabilities for sexual and reproductive health: a participatory interdisciplinary approach to workforce transformation.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Telehealth readiness among Saudi nurses: the critical role of innovative self-efficacy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Navigating technology-facilitated abuse: A participatory action research study with young adults living with HIV and key populations in Kenya.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Health-Related Stigma: The Affordances of Electronic Health Management Systems in the Production of Structural Stigma.Sociology of health & illness · 2025Article
- Digital determinants of sexual and reproductive health-workforce perspectives on digital and data literacies.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Mpox Illness Narratives: Stigmatising Care and Recovery During and After an Emergency Outbreak.Qualitative health research · 2024Article
- Health policy counterpublics: Enacting collective resistances to US molecular HIV surveillance and cluster detection and response programs.Social studies of science · 2024Article
- Use of Digital Health and Digital Therapeutics to Treat SUD in Criminal Justice Settings: a Review.Current addiction reports · 2024Article
- Communication and coordination of care for people living with HIV: a qualitative study of the patient perspective.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- The future of translational medical humanities: bridging the data/narrative divide.Medical humanities · 2023Article
- Advancing Dialogue About Consent and Molecular HIV Surveillance in the United States: Four Proposals Following a Federal Advisory Panel's Call for Major Reforms.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- The adoption and sustainability of digital therapeutics in justice systems: A pilot feasibility study.The International journal on drug policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In 2018, following government policy changes to Australia's national electronic health record system, 'My Health Record', consumer advocates-including organisations representing people living with HIV, people who use drugs and sex workers-raised concerns about privacy and data security. Responding to these controversies, this study explores the practical, ethical and political complexities of engaging stigmatised communities with digital health systems. Methods: We conducted 16 qualitative semi-structured interviews in 2020 with key informants representing communities who experience stigma, discrimination and marginalisation in Australia. These communities included people living with HIV, sex workers, people who inject drugs, gay and bisexual men and transgender and gender diverse people. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Key informants were sceptical of proposed benefits of electronic health records for their communities, and concerned about privacy risks and the potential for discrimination. Meaningful consultation, consent mechanisms and tackling structural stigma were raised as solutions for engaging communities. Conclusions: Although communities could benefit from being included in digital health systems, significant cultural, legal and social reforms from government were believed to be necessary to build trust in digital health systems. We argue that these forms of data justice are necessary for effective future systems. Policy Implications: Engaging stigmatised communities-including in relation to gender, sexuality, sex work, drug use, HIV-requires a commitment to data justice. The design and implementation of digital health systems requires investment in ongoing and meaningful consultation with communities and representative organisations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.