ArticleConference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics2022
Language Model-Guided Classifier Adaptation for Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication.
Article in Conference proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChatBCI, a P300 speller BCI with context-driven word prediction leveraging large language models, from concept to evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Plug-and-Play Stability for Intracortical Brain-Computer Interfaces: A One-Year Demonstration of Seamless Brain-to-Text Communication.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), such as the P300 speller, can provide a means of communication for individuals with severe neuromuscular limitations. BCIs interpret electroencephalography (EEG) signals in order to translate embedded information about a user's intent into executable commands to control external devices. However, EEG signals are inherently noisy and nonstationary, posing a challenge to extended BCI use. Conventionally, a BCI classifier is trained via supervised learning in an offline calibration session; once trained, the classifier is deployed for online use and is not updated. As the statistics of a user's EEG data change over time, the performance of a static classifier may decline with extended use. It is therefore desirable to automatically adapt the classifier to current data statistics without requiring offline recalibration. In an existing semi-supervised learning approach, the classifier is trained on labeled EEG data and is then updated using incoming unlabeled EEG data and classifier-predicted labels. To reduce the risk of learning from incorrect predictions, a threshold is imposed to exclude unlabeled data with low-confidence label predictions from the expanded training set when retraining the adaptive classifier. In this work, we propose the use of a language model for spelling error correction and disambiguation to provide information about label correctness during semi-supervised learning. Results from simulations with multi-session P300 speller user EEG data demonstrate that our language-guided semi-supervised approach significantly improves spelling accuracy relative to conventional BCI calibration and threshold-based semi-supervised learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.