Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776799›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the National Research Centre2023

Field evaluation of the novel One Step Malaria Pf and Pf/Pv rapid diagnostic tests and the proportion of HRP-2 gene deletion identified on samples collected in the Pwani region, Tanzania.

Zena E Mwangonela, Young Ye, Qin Rachel, Hajirani M Msuya, Tunu G Mwamlima, Sarah S Mswata, Prosper P Chaki, Ester G Kimaro, Clement N Mweya, Maxmillian G Mpina and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Seroprevalence of antibodies toFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zena E MwangonelaIfakara Health Institute Bagamoyo Branch, P.O.Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Young YeInTec Products, Inc., 332 Xinguang Road Xinyang Industrial Area, Haicang, Xiamen City, 361022 China.
Qin RachelInTec Products, Inc., 332 Xinguang Road Xinyang Industrial Area, Haicang, Xiamen City, 361022 China.
Hajirani M MsuyaIfakara Health Institute Bagamoyo Branch, P.O.Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Tunu G MwamlimaIfakara Health Institute Bagamoyo Branch, P.O.Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Sarah S MswataIfakara Health Institute Bagamoyo Branch, P.O.Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Prosper P ChakiIfakara Health Institute Bagamoyo Branch, P.O.Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Ester G KimaroThe Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, P.O.Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania.
Clement N MweyaUnivesity of Dar Es Salaam, Mbeya College of Health and Allied Science, P.O.Box 608, Mbeya, Tanzania.
Maxmillian G MpinaIfakara Health Institute Bagamoyo Branch, P.O.Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Grace W MwangokaIfakara Health Institute Bagamoyo Branch, P.O.Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) have played an important role in the early detection of clinical malaria in an endemic area. While several mRDTs are currently on the market, the availability of mRDTs with high sensitivity and specificity will merit the fight against malaria. We evaluated the field performance of a novel One Step Malaria (P.f/P.v) Tri-line and One Step Malaria (P.f) rapid test kits in Pwani, Tanzania. Methods: In a cross-sectional study conducted in Bagamoyo and Kibiti districts in Tanzania, symptomatic patients were tested using the SD BIOLINE, One Step Malaria (P.f/P.v) Tri-line and One Step Malaria (P.f) rapid test kits, microscope, and quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR). An additional qPCR assay was carried out to detect Histidine-Rich Protein 2 (HRP-2) gene deletion on mRDT negative but microscope and qPCR positive samples. Microscope results confirmed by qPCR were used for analysis, where qPCR was used as a reference method. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of One Step P.f/P.v Tri-line mRDTs were 96.0% (CI 93.5-97.7%) and 98.3% (CI 96.8-99.2%), respectively. One Step P.f mRDT had sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% (CI 92.5-97.1%) and 97.9% (CI 96.3-99.0%) respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 97.6% (CI 95.4-98.7%) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.2% (CI 95.5-98.3%) for the One Step P.f/P.v Tri-line mRDTs respectively, while One Step P.f mRDT had positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.0% (CI 94.8-98.3%) and 96.7 (CI 94.9-97.9%) respectively. 9.8% (CI 7.84-11.76) of all samples tested and reported to be malaria-negative by mRDT had HRP-2 gene deletion. Conclusion: One Step Malaria P.f/P.v Tri-line and One Step Malaria P.f rapid test kits have similar sensitivity and specificity as the standard mRDT that is currently in the market, demonstrating the potential to contribute in the fight against malaria in endemic settings. However, the identified malaria parasites population with HRP-2 gene deletion pose a threat to the current mRDT usability in the field and warrants further investigations.

Indexed as

HRP-2 gene deletionMalariaRapid diagnostic testSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID36776799
PMCPMC9904258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.