Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776698›Full record

ArticleLanguage, cognition and neuroscience2023

ERPs Reveal How Semantic and Syntactic Processing Unfold across Parafoveal and Foveal Vision during Sentence Comprehension.

Chuchu Li, Katherine J Midgley, Phillip J Holcomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chuchu LiUniversity of California, San Diego.
Katherine J MidgleySan Diego State University.
Phillip J HolcombSan Diego State University.

Funding

The Neuro-cognition of Word ComprehensionR37HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
The cognitive neuroscience of word comprehensionR01HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 1995 to 2010
$2.8M
ERPs reveal the Mechanisms of Bilingual Language ControlR00HD099325 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LI, CHUCHU · 2022 to 2024
$741k
ERPs reveal the Mechanisms of Bilingual Language ControlK99HD099325 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LI, CHUCHU · 2019 to 2021
$263k
NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD099325NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD099325NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD025889NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD025889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined how readers process content and function words in sentence comprehension with ERPs. Participants read simple declarative sentences using a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) with flankers paradigm. Sentences contained either an unexpected semantically anomalous content word, an unexpected syntactically anomalous function word or were well formed with no anomalies. ERPs were examined when target words were in the parafoveal or foveal vision. Unexpected content words elicited a typically distributed N400 when displayed in the parafovea, followed by a longer-lasting, widely distributed positivity starting around 300 ms once foveated. Unexpected function words elicited a left lateralized LAN-like component when presented in the parafovea, followed by a left lateralized, posteriorly distributed P600 when foveated. These results suggested that both semantic and syntactic processing involve two stages-the initial, fast process that can be completed in parafovea, followed by a more in depth attentionally mediated assessment that occurs with direct attention.

Indexed as

ERPsParafoveal and foveal processingReadingSemantic and syntactic anomaly

Identifiers

PMID36776698
PMCPMC9916175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.