Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776642›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602021

Topics Analysis of Reddit and Twitter Posts Discussing Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Distress From 2017 to 2019.

Jacob A Rohde, Adams L Sibley, Seth M Noar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Analysis of Reddit Reveals Clascoterone Questions Among People with Acne.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob A RohdeHussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6334-1986
Adams L SibleyDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Seth M NoarHussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms are popular tools for people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to seek support. In the current study, we sought to examine and characterize IBD and distress discourse on public social media platforms. Our goal was to identify topics associated with these online discussions. Methods: We collected public social media posts about IBD and distress from Reddit ( Results: Most Reddit (79%) and Twitter (56%) posts mentioned at least 1 IBD topic. The order of topic prevalence was the same for the 2 platforms. Symptoms was the most mentioned topic (Reddit: 57%, Twitter 36%), followed by medication (Reddit: 30%, Twitter 11%), and nutrition (Reddit: 27%, Twitter 9%). Intimacy was the least mentioned topic (Reddit: 2%, Twitter: <1%). Topic co-occurrences varied by platform. Most Reddit posts (57%) mentioned at least 2 IBD topics, whereas only 27% of tweets mentioned multiple IBD topics. Conclusions: This study contributes to a growing literature examining how IBD is discussed on social media-specifically, in distress-related contexts on Reddit and Twitter. These cross-platform findings highlight important areas potentially associated with IBD-related distress, which could help facilitate future support.

Indexed as

distressinflammatory bowel diseaseRedditsocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID36776642
PMCPMC9802272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.