Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776617›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023

A Heuristic Machine Learning-Based Optimization Technique to Predict Lung Cancer Patient Survival.

Sonia Kukreja, Munish Sabharwal, Mohd Asif Shah, D S Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sonia KukrejaSchool of Computing Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1024-4549
Munish SabharwalSchool of Computing Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7338-6982
Mohd Asif ShahKebri Dehar University, Kebri Dahar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1818-9548
D S GillSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0829-9986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer has been a significant threat to human health and well-being, posing the biggest obstacle in the history of human sickness. The high death rate in cancer patients is primarily due to the complexity of the disease and the wide range of clinical outcomes. Increasing the accuracy of the prediction is equally crucial as predicting the survival rate of cancer patients, which has become a key issue of cancer research. Many models have been suggested at the moment. However, most of them simply use single genetic data or clinical data to construct prediction models for cancer survival. There is a lot of emphasis in present survival studies on determining whether or not a patient will survive five years. The personal issue of how long a lung cancer patient will survive remains unanswered. The proposed technique Naive Bayes and SSA is estimating the overall survival time with lung cancer. Two machine learning challenges are derived from a single customized query. To begin with, determining whether a patient will survive for more than five years is a simple binary question. The second step is to develop a five-year survival model using regression analysis. When asked to forecast how long a lung cancer patient would survive within five years, the mean absolute error (MAE) of this technique's predictions is accurate within a month. Several biomarker genes have been associated with lung cancers. The accuracy, recall, and precision achieved from this algorithm are 98.78%, 98.4%, and 98.6%, respectively.

Indexed as

HeuristicsLung NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36776617
PMCPMC9911240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.