Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776590›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Use of Antibiotic-impregnated Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Plates for Prevention of Periprosthetic Infection in Breast Reconstruction.

Thomas Johnstone, Kelsey Lipman, Nathan Makarewicz, Jennifer Shah, Elizabeth Turner, Victoria Posternak, Daniel Chang, Brian Thornton, Rahim Nazerali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas JohnstoneDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Kelsey LipmanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Nathan MakarewiczDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Jennifer ShahDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Elizabeth TurnerThornton Plastic Surgery, Louisville, Ky.
Victoria PosternakDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Daniel ChangDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
Brian ThorntonThornton Plastic Surgery, Louisville, Ky.
Rahim NazeraliDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periprosthetic infections remain a major challenge for breast reconstruction. Local antibiotic delivery systems, such as antibiotic beads and spacers, have been widely used within other surgical fields, but their use within plastic surgery remains scarce. In this study, we demonstrate the use of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) plates for infection prophylaxis in tissue expander (TE)-based breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with prepectoral TEs over the span of 5 years performed by two surgeons was completed, revealing a total of 447 patients. Data pertaining to patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Fifty patients underwent TE reconstruction with the addition of a PMMA plate (Stryker, Kalamazoo, Michigan) impregnated with tobramycin and vancomycin. Antibiotic plates were removed at the time of TE-to-implant exchange. Patient-matching analysis was performed using the 397 patients without PMMA plates to generate a 50-patient nonintervention cohort for statistical analysis. Results: The intervention cohort (n = 50) and 1:1 patient-matched nonintervention cohort (n = 50) demonstrated no statistically significant differences in patient demographics or operative characteristics other than PMMA plate placement. The rate of operative periprosthetic infection was 4% in the intervention group and 14% in the nonintervention group ( Conclusion: Local antibiotic delivery using antibiotic-impregnated PMMA plates can be safely and effectively used for infection prevention with TE-based breast reconstruction.

Identifiers

PMID36776590
PMCPMC9911200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.