ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Study of high-altitude cerebral edema using multimodal imaging.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of cerebral blood flow and glymphatic function in acute mountain sickness by MRI ASL and DTI ALPS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tetramethylpyrazine exerts neuroprotective effects in a mouse model of acute hypobaric hypoxia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Altitude-related features and prognosis in patients with reversible splenial lesion syndrome.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- High-altitude Cerebral Edema and High-altitude Pulmonary Edema Diagnosed in the Desert: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Reversible leukoencephalopathy with seizures: a case of severe high-altitude cerebral edema.Acta epileptologica · 2024Article
- Altitude illnesses.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- Rehabilitation after Hypoxic and Metabolic Brain Injury in a Mountain Climber.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the brain imaging features of high-altitude cerebral edema (HACE) using computed tomography (CT) and multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to explore its injury characteristics. Materials and methods: We selected 30 patients with HACE diagnosed between January 2012 to August 2022 as the experimental group and 60 patients with dizziness on traveling from the plain to the plateau or from lower altitude to higher altitude in a short period of time as the control group. We collected general clinical data from the experimental group and classified it according to clinical symptoms. In both groups, we then performed a head CT and multi-sequence MRI (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, and DWI). Among them, nine patients with HACE were also scanned using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Finally, we analyzed the images. Results: According to clinical symptoms, we divided the 30 cases of HACE into 12 mild cases and 18 severe cases. There was no significant difference in sex, age, leukocyte, neutrophil, or glucose content between mild and severe HACE. The sensitivity and specificity of the MRI diagnosis were 100 and 100%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the CT diagnosis were 23.3 and 100%, respectively. The distribution range of deep and juxtacortical white matter edema was significantly larger in severe HACE than in mild HACE ( Conclusions: MRI has more advantages than CT in the evaluation of HACE, especially in the DWI sequence. The white matter injury of severe HACE is more severe and extensive, especially in the corpus callosum, and some CMBs and corticospinal tract edema may also appear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.