ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022
Augmented reality for minimally invasive spinal surgery.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of augmented reality on radiation exposure during spine surgery: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Augmented reality-enabled image-guided surgical navigation in minimally invasive spine surgery: application beyond screw placement in prone lateral transpsoas interbody fusion-a cadaveric surgical technique study.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- 3D ultrasound shape completion and anatomical feature detection for minimally invasive spine surgery.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Accuracy and potential risk factors of pedicle screw placement using a noninvasive-registration robotic system in the thoracolumbar spine.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The application of robotic and artificial intelligence technologies in spinal surgery: a review focused on prospects in remote areas of China.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review From Diagnosis to Rehabilitation.Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
- Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spinal Interventions: Current Use and Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
- Pioneering Augmented and Mixed Reality in Cranial Surgery: The First Latin American Experience.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Augmenting Reality in Spinal Surgery: A Narrative Review of Augmented Reality Applications in Pedicle Screw Instrumentation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Integrating Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: Redefining Precision with New Technologies.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology that can overlay computer graphics onto the real world and enhance visual feedback from information systems. Within the past several decades, innovations related to AR have been integrated into our daily lives; however, its application in medicine, specifically in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), may be most important to understand. AR navigation provides auditory and haptic feedback, which can further enhance surgeons' capabilities and improve safety. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to address previous and current applications of AR, AR in MISS, limitations of today's technology, and future areas of innovation. Methods: A literature review related to applications of AR technology in previous and current generations was conducted. Results: AR systems have been implemented for treatments related to spinal surgeries in recent years, and AR may be an alternative to current approaches such as traditional navigation, robotically assisted navigation, fluoroscopic guidance, and free hand. As AR is capable of projecting patient anatomy directly on the surgical field, it can eliminate concern for surgeon attention shift from the surgical field to navigated remote screens, line-of-sight interruption, and cumulative radiation exposure as the demand for MISS increases. Conclusion: AR is a novel technology that can improve spinal surgery, and limitations will likely have a great impact on future technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.