Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776410›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain (the BEAT-pain study).

Asimina Lazaridou, Myrella Paschali, Eric S Vilsmark, Jason Sadora, Dustin Burton, Annie Bashara, Robert R Edwards

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04607460 (Biofeedback EMG Alternative Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain and Chronic Cancer Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04607460 nacompletednot on this map

Biofeedback EMG Alternative Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain and Chronic Cancer Pain (BEAT-Pain): A Pilot Efficacy Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled330ConditionsChronic Low-back Pain, Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, MigraineArmsJOGO Digital Therapeutics EMG Biofeedback for Lower Back Pain, JOGO Digital Therapeutics EMG Biofeedback for Persistent Post Mastectomy Pain, JOGO Digital Therapeutics EMG Biofeedback for Migraine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. General Innovations in Pain Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asimina LazaridouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9203-0009
Myrella PaschaliDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Eric S VilsmarkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jason SadoraFielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Dustin BurtonFielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Annie BasharaFielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Robert R EdwardsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and potential effectiveness of an 8-week virtual EMG biofeedback intervention for patients with CLBP. Methods: Patients with CLBP completed validated baseline and post-intervention assessments of pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory), back pain-related disability (Oswestry Disability Index), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Participants underwent a series of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) procedures assessing responses to mechanical stimuli during two separate visits (baseline and post-intervention). In addition, we assessed, using surface EMG, the muscle tension in the trapezius, latissimus, and low back muscles at each session. Patients were randomized into the EMG biofeedback intervention or usual care group. Factorial analysis of variance including the interaction between treatment group and time was used to analyze the changes in pain intensity (primary outcome), pain interference, disability (secondary outcomes), anxiety, and depression (secondary outcomes). Results: Compared to the treatment as usual comparison group, patients in the EMG biofeedback group reported lower pain intensity after completing the intervention (mean group difference 0.9, 95% CI -1.07, -0.32; Conclusions: Virtual EMG biofeedback shows promise as a potential therapy for reducing pain and disability in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Indexed as

biofeedbackChronic paindigital therapeuticstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36776410
PMCPMC9909059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.