Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776387›Full record

ReviewACS catalysis2023

Materials Screening by the Descriptor

Samad Razzaq, Kai S Exner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS catalysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Compositional Engineering of TiACS applied energy materials · 2025
    Article
  6. Identification of Ni-NJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Oxygen evolution reaction on IrONature communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Cooperative Active Sites on AgAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Importance of the Walden Inversion for the Activity Volcano Plot of Oxygen Evolution.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samad RazzaqUniversity Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Chemistry, Theoretical Inorganic Chemistry, Universitätsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany.
Kai S ExnerUniversity Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Chemistry, Theoretical Inorganic Chemistry, Universitätsstraße 5, 45141 Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2934-6075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To move from fossil-based energy resources to a society based on renewables, electrode materials free of precious noble metals are required to efficiently catalyze electrochemical processes in fuel cells, batteries, or electrolyzers. Materials screening operating at minimal computational cost is a powerful method to assess the performance of potential electrode compositions based on heuristic concepts. While the thermodynamic overpotential in combination with the volcano concept refers to the most popular descriptor-based analysis in the literature, this notion cannot reproduce experimental trends reasonably well. About two years ago, the concept of

Identifiers

PMID36776387
PMCPMC9903997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.