Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776297›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Ovarian Real-World International Consortium (ORWIC): A multicentre, real-world analysis of epithelial ovarian cancer treatment and outcomes.

Sue Cheeseman, Bethany Levick, Will Sopwith, Hayley Fenton, Eun Ji Nam, DongKyu Kim, Subin Lim, Elodie Martin, Jean-Sébastien Frenel, François Bocquet and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Sue CheesemanLeeds Cancer Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Bethany LevickLeeds Cancer Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Will SopwithLeeds Cancer Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Hayley FentonLeeds Cancer Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Eun Ji NamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Medical Life Science, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
DongKyu KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Subin LimReal-World Evidence Team, ALYND, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Elodie MartinDepartment of Biostatistics, Clinical Trial Sponsor Unit, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes-Angers, France.
Jean-Sébastien FrenelOncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Center for Research in Cancerology and Immunology, INSERM UMR 1232, Nantes University and Angers University, Nantes-Angers, France.
François BocquetData Factory and Analytics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Law and Social Change Laboratory, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, CNRS UMR 6297, Nantes University, Nantes-Angers, France.
Paul KubelacThe Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta", Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Patriciu Achimas-CadariuThe Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta", Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Catalin VladThe Oncology Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta", Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Marion ChevrierDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) University, Paris, France.
Roman RouzierDepartment of Breast and Gynecological Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Matthieu CartonDepartment of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) University, Paris, France.
Joana Savva-BordaloDepartment of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto) Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Marta MagalhãesCancer Epidemiology Group-Research Center, IPO Porto, Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal.
Marina BorgesManagement, Outcomes Research and Economics in Healthcare Group-Research Center, IPO Porto, Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal.
Andrea WolfInternal Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sven BeckerInternal Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Nicolas NiklasInternal Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Mariana Guergova-KurasOncology Evidence Network, IQVIA, La Défense, France.
Geoff HallLeeds Cancer Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Much drug development and published analysis for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) focuses on early-line treatment. Full sequences of treatment from diagnosis to death and the impact of later lines of therapy are rarely studied. We describe the establishment of an international network of cancer centers configured to compare real-world treatment pathways in UK, Portugal, Germany, South Korea, France and Romania (the Ovarian Real-World International Consortium; ORWIC). Methods: 3344 patients diagnosed with EOC (2012-2018) were analysed using a common data model and hub and spoke programming approach applied to existing electronic medical records. Consistent definition of line of therapy between sites and an efficient approach to analysis within the limitations of local information governance was achieved. Results: Median age of participants was 53-67 years old and 5-29% were ECOG >1. Between 62% and 84% of patients were diagnosed with late-stage disease (FIGO III-IV). Sites treating younger and fitter patients had higher rates of debulking surgery for those diagnosed at late stage than sites with older, more frail patients. At least 21% of patients treated with systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) had recurrent disease following second-line therapy (2L); up to 11 lines of SACT treatment were recorded for some patients. Platinum-based SACT was consistently used across sites at 1L, but choices at 2L varied, with hormone therapies commonly used in the UK and Portugal. The use (and type) of maintenance therapy following 1L also varied. Beyond 2L, there was little consensus between sites on treatment choice: trial compounds and unspecified combinations of other agents were common. Discussion: Specific treatment sequences are reported up to 4L and the establishment of this network facilitates future analysis of comparative outcomes per line of treatment with the aim of optimizing available options for patients with recurrent EOC. In particular, this real-world network can be used to assess the growing use of PARP inhibitors. The real-world optimization of advanced line treatment will be especially important for patients not usually eligible for involvement with clinical trials. The resources to enable this analysis to be implemented elsewhere are supplied and the network will seek to grow in coverage of further sites.

Indexed as

chemotherapydebulking surgeryepithelial ovarian cancerEuropereal-worldtreatment

Identifiers

PMID36776297
PMCPMC9911857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.