Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36776251›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Coronary microvascular dysfunction: A review of recent progress and clinical implications.

Rajan Rehan, Andy Yong, Martin Ng, James Weaver, Rajesh Puranik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Emerging Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy for Cardiac Vascular Imaging in Zebrafish.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rajan RehanDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andy YongDepartment of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Martin NgDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
James WeaverDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rajesh PuranikDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronary microcirculation plays a cardinal role in regulating coronary blood flow to meet the changing metabolic demands of the myocardium. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) refers to structural and functional remodeling of the coronary microcirculation. CMD plays a role in the pathogenesis of obstructive and non-obstructive coronary syndromes as well as myocardial diseases, including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Despite recent diagnostic advancements, CMD is often under-appreciated in clinical practice, and may allow for the development of novel therapeutic targets. This review explores the diagnosis and pathogenic role of CMD across a range of cardiovascular diseases, its prognostic significance, and the current therapeutic landscape.

Indexed as

coronary microcirculationendothelial dysfunctioninflammationINOCAmicrovascular angina

Identifiers

PMID36776251
PMCPMC9908997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.