Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36775965›Full record

Trial reportSleep2023

Influence of mid-afternoon nap duration and sleep parameters on memory encoding, mood, processing speed, and vigilance.

Ruth L F Leong, TeYang Lau, Andrew R Dicom, Teck Boon Teo, Ju Lynn Ong, Michael W L Chee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04984824 (Comparing the Effects of 10, 30 and 60 Minute Naps on Cognitive Performance and Memory Encoding), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04984824 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing the Effects of 10, 30 and 60 Minute Naps on Cognitive Performance and Memory Encoding

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolRan2020 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsSleepArmsNap duration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruth L F LeongDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5567-2152
TeYang LauDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew R DicomDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7708-6880
Teck Boon TeoDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Ju Lynn OngDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5115-4112
Michael W L CheeDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6087-0548
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo determine how mid-afternoon naps of differing durations benefit memory encoding, vigilance, speed of processing (SOP), mood, and sleepiness; to evaluate if these benefits extend past 3 hr post-awakening and to examine how sleep macrostructure during naps modulate these benefits.

methodsFollowing short habitual sleep, 32 young adults underwent four experimental conditions in randomized order: wake; naps of 10 min, 30 min, and 60 min duration verified with polysomnography. A 10-min test battery was delivered at a pre-nap baseline, and at 5 min, 30 min, 60 min, and 240 min post-nap. Participants encoded pictures 90 min post-nap and were tested for recognition 210 min later.

resultsNaps ranging from 10 to 60 min increased positive mood and alleviated self-reported sleepiness up to 240 min post-nap. Compared to waking, only naps of 30 min improved memory encoding. Improvements in vigilance were moderate, and benefits for SOP were not observed. Sleep inertia was observed for the 30 min to 60 min naps but was resolved within 30 min after waking. We found no significant associations between sleep macrostructure and memory benefits.

conclusionsWith short habitual sleep, naps ranging from 10 to 60 min had clear and lasting benefits for positive mood and self-reported sleepiness/alertness. Cognitive improvements were moderate, with only the 30 min nap showing benefits for memory encoding. While there is no clear "winning" nap duration, a 30 min nap appears to have the best trade-off between practicability and benefit. CLINICAL TRIAL ID: Effects of Varying Duration of Naps on Cognitive Performance and Memory Encoding, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04984824, NCT04984824.

Indexed as

Processing SpeedSleep Wake DisordersAttentionHumansSleepSleepinessWakefulnessYoung Adultmemory encodingmoodnapprocessing speedsleep macrostructurevigilance

Identifiers

PMID36775965
PMCPMC10091091
OpenAlexW4320494720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.