Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36775776›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2023

Development of PIVOT with MI: A motivational Interviewing-Based vaccine communication training for pediatric clinicians.

Sean T O'Leary, Christine I Spina, Heather Spielvogle, Jeffrey D Robinson, Kathleen Garrett, Cathryn Perreira, Barbara Pahud, Amanda F Dempsey, Douglas J Opel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07552857 (Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk for Inpatients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07552857 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk for Inpatients (PIVOT-IN): A Vaccine Communication Training Intervention for Pediatric Inpatient Clinicians

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeattle Children's HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled2,000ConditionsPreventive Health Services (PREV HEALTH SERV)ArmsPIVOT-IN, Standardized Vaccine Eligibility Screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sean T O'LearyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States. Electronic address: sean.oleary@cuanschutz.edu.
Christine I SpinaAdult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Heather SpielvogleSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jeffrey D RobinsonDepartment of Communication, Portland State University, Portland, OR, United States.
Kathleen GarrettAdult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Cathryn PerreiraAdult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Barbara PahudDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Amanda F DempseyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Douglas J OpelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States; Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USPortland State University · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Evaluation of the Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk with Motivational Interviewing (PIVOT with MI) InterventionR01HD093628 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI O'LEARY, SEAN T, OPEL, DOUGLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay or refusal of childhood vaccines is common and may be increasing. Pediatricians are parents' most trusted source for vaccine information, yet many struggle with how to communicate with parents who resist recommended vaccines. Evidence-based communication strategies for vaccine conversations are lacking. In this manuscript, we describe the development and perceived usefulness of a curriculum to train clinicians on a specific vaccine communication strategy as part of the PIVOT with MI study, a cluster randomized trial testing the effectiveness of this communication strategy on increasing childhood vaccination uptake among 24 pediatric practices in Colorado and Washington. The communication strategy is based on the existing evidence-based communication strategies of a presumptive format for initiating vaccine conversations and use of motivational interviewing if hesitancy persists. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews with pediatric clinicians helped inform the development of the training curriculum, which consisted of an introductory video module followed by 3 training sessions. Between September 2019 and January 2021, 134 pediatric clinicians (92 pediatricians, 42 advanced practice providers) participated in the training as part of the PIVOT with MI study. Of these, 92 % viewed an introductory video module, 93 % attended or viewed a baseline synchronous training, 82 % attended or viewed a 1st refresher training, and 77 % attended or viewed a 2nd refresher training. A follow-up survey was administered August 2020 through March 2021; among respondents (n = 100), >95 % of participants reported that each component of the training program was very or somewhat useful. These data suggest that the PIVOT with MI training intervention is a useful vaccine communication resource with the potential for high engagement among pediatric clinicians.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingPapillomavirus VaccinesChildCommunicationCurriculumHumansParentsVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesMotivational InterviewingPresumptive recommendationVaccine communication trainingVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36775776
PMCPMC12798271
OpenAlexW4319870707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.