ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2023
Paying Family Medical Caregivers for Children's Home Healthcare in Colorado: A Working Medicaid Model.
Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Care of Infants and Children with Tracheostomies: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Guideline
- Magic Mothers: How Parents of Children with Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Can Make Health System Crises Disappear.Journal of developmental and physical disabilities · 2025Article
- Bridging the gaps in pediatric complex healthcare: the case for home nursing care among children with medical complexity.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Family Caregivers Employed by Home Care Agencies: Lessons Learned From Switzerland and the United States.Public health reviews · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the characteristics and healthcare use of children with medical complexity who receive paid certified nursing assistant (CNA) care by a family member (family CNA) and by a traditional nonfamily member (nonfamily CNA). STUDY
designThis was retrospective cohort study of children who received CNA care through Colorado's Medicaid paid family caregiving program between 2017 and 2019 by a home healthcare agency. We compared patient characteristics between the family CNA and nonfamily CNA groups. A multivariable Poisson regression model was used to compare hospitalization rates (days in the hospital per year), adjusting for patient age patient sex, nursing care, and complex chronic condition.
resultsOf 861 patients, 79% (n = 680) received family CNA care and 21% (n = 181) received nonfamily CNA care. Patient demographics and hospitalization did not differ between the groups, although patients who had family CNAs were less likely to receive additional nursing-level care (42% vs 60%, P < .01). Family and nonfamily CNA caregivers had similar characteristics, except that family CNA caregivers had substantially better 3-year retention (82% vs 9%, P < .01) despite lower average hourly pay ($14.60 vs $17.60 per hour, P < .01). Hospitalizations were rare (<10% of patients). In the adjusted model, patients who received family CNA care experienced 1 more hospitalized day per year, compared with patients who received nonfamily CNA care (P < .001).
conclusionsPaid family caregivers provided CAN-level care to children with medical complexity with a greater employee retention compared with nonfamily CNA caregivers, with marginally different hospitalization rates using a family-centered approach. This model may help address workforce shortages while also providing income to family caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.