Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36775072›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2023

Increasing Pancreatic Cancer Incidence in Young Women in the United States: A Population-Based Time-Trend Analysis, 2001-2018.

Yazan Abboud, Jamil S Samaan, Janice Oh, Yi Jiang, Navkiran Randhawa, Daniel Lew, Jenan Ghaith, Pranav Pala, ChristineAnn Leyson, Rabindra Watson and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pancreatic cancer in 2025: Have we found a solution?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  14. Challenges of early detection of pancreatic cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yazan AbboudKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Jamil S SamaanDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Janice OhDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Yi JiangKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Navkiran RandhawaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Franciscan Health, Olympia Fields, Illinois.
Daniel LewKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Jenan GhaithKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Pranav PalaKamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Hyderabad, India.
ChristineAnn LeysonKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Rabindra WatsonKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Quin LiuKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Kenneth ParkKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Shirley PaskiKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Arsen OsipovDepartment of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Brent K LarsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Andrew HendifarDepartment of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Katelyn AtkinsCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Los Angeles, California.
Nicholas N NissenDepartment of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Debiao LiBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Stephen J PandolKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Simon K LoKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Srinivas GaddamKarsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: srinivas.gaddam@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USFranciscan Health · USKamineni Hospitals · IN

Funding

Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Prevention of Pancreatogenic Diabetes - Administrative SupplementU01DK108314 · NIDDK · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mark Goodarzi, Stephen J. Pandol · 2015 to 2026
$6.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsPrevious studies have shown an increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer (PC), especially in younger women; however, this has not been externally validated. In addition, there are limited data about contributing factors to this trend. We report age and sex-specific time-trend analysis of PC age-adjusted incidence rates (aIRs) using the National Program of Cancer Registries database without Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data.

methodsPC aIR, mortality rates, annual percentage change, and average annual percentage change (AAPC) were calculated and assessed for parallelism and identicalness. Age-specific analyses were conducted in older (≥55 years) and younger (<55 years) adults. PC incidence based on demographics, tumor characteristics, and mortality were evaluated in younger adults.

resultsA total of 454,611 patients were diagnosed with PC between 2001 and 2018 with significantly increasing aIR in women (AAPC = 1.27%) and men (AAPC = 1.14%) without a difference (P = .37). Similar results were seen in older adults. However, in younger adults (53,051 cases; 42.9% women), women experienced a greater increase in aIR than men (AAPCs = 2.36%, P < .001 vs 0.62%, P = 0.62) with nonparallel trends (P < .001) and AAPC difference of 1.74% (P < .001). This AAPC difference appears to be due to rising aIR in Blacks (2.23%; P < .001), adenocarcinoma histopathologic subtype (0.89%; P = .003), and location in the head-of-pancreas (1.64%; P < .001). PC mortality was found to be unchanged in women but decreasing in counterpart men (AAPC difference = 0.54%; P = .001).

conclusionUsing nationwide data, covering ≈64.5% of the U.S. population, we externally validate a rapidly increasing aIR of PC in younger women. There was a big separation of the incidence trend between women and men aged 15-34 years between 2001 and 2018 (>200% difference), and it did not show slowing down.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePancreasRegistriesUnited StatesEpidemiologyIncidenceMortalityPancreatic CancerSex

Identifiers

PMID36775072
PMCPMC11364483
OpenAlexW4319985743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.