ArticleDiabetes research and clinical practice2023
Impact of changes in diabetes screening guidelines on testing eligibility and potential yield among adults without diagnosed diabetes in the United States.
Article in Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global, regional, and national cascades of diabetes care, 2000-23: a systematic review and modelling analysis using findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Automated Text Message Outreach to Increase Diabetes Screening: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- First-trimester preexisting diabetes screening in Medicaid beneficiaries.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Development and Pilot Evaluation of a Wearable 12-Lead ECG System for Multilead Feature Analysis in Individuals with Different Glycemic Status.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- In Vivo Models of Diabetes: Unravelling Molecular Pathways in Metabolic and Skeletal Complications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Assessment of Blood Glucose Measurement Using New Noninvasive Technology: Protocol and Methodology.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Promoting Access to Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Rural Areas: A Report from the Field.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Diabetes Among U.S. Refugees and Opportunities to Improve Screening, 2012-2022.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025Article
- Use of Automated Machine Learning to Detect Undiagnosed Diabetes in US Adults: Development and Validation Study.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- Derivation and Validation of D-RISK: An Electronic Health Record-Driven Risk Score to Detect Undiagnosed Dysglycemia in Clinical Practice.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- Validating an Electronic Health Record Algorithm for Diabetes Screening Eligibility in the Emergency Department.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- HbA1c screening in patients with early breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2025Article
- Diabetes Mellitus screening and associated factors in Peru: A cross-sectional analysis of a national health survey.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Determinants of health and mortality in undiagnosed diabetes: A nationally representative US adult, 2011-2020.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Testing for Diabetes Among US Adults With Overweight or Obesity, 2016-2019.Preventing chronic disease · 2023Article
- Improving Diabetes Screening in the Primary Care Clinic.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2023Article
- Clinical performance and health equity implications of the American Diabetes Association's 2023 screening recommendation for prediabetes and diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsRecent USPSTF and ADA guidelines expanded criteria of whom to test to identify prediabetes and diabetes. We described which Americans are eligible and report receiving glucose testing by USPSTF 2015 and 2021 as well as ADA 2003 and 2022 recommendations, and performance of each guideline.
methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from 6,007 non-pregnant U.S. adults without diagnosed diabetes in the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. We reported proportions of adults who met each guideline's criteria for glucose testing and reported receiving glucose testing in the past three years, overall and by key population subgroups,. Defining prediabetes (FPG 100-125 mg/dL and/or HbA1c 5.7-6.4 %) or previously undiagnosed diabetes (FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5 %), we assessed sensitivity and specificity.
resultsDuring 2013-2018, 76.7 million, 90.4 million, 157.7 million, and 169.5 million US adults met eligibility for glucose testing by USPSTF 2015, 2021, and ADA 2003 and 2022 guidelines, respectively. On average, 52 % of adults reported receiving glucose testing within the past 3 years. Likelihood of receiving glucose testing was lower among younger adults, men, Hispanic adults, those with less than high school completion, those living in poverty, and those without health insurance or a usual place of care than their respective counterparts. ADA recommendations were most sensitive (range: 91.0 % to 100.0 %) and least specific (range: 18.3 % to 35.3 %); USPSTF recommendations exhibited lower sensitivity (51.9 % to 66.6 %), but higher specificity (56.6 % to 74.5 %).
conclusionsAn additional 12-14 million US adults are eligible for diabetes screening. USPSTF 2021 criteria provide balanced sensitivity and specificity while ADA 2022 criteria maximize sensitivity. Glucose testing does not align with guidelines and disparities remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.