Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36774510›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2023

Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach.

Claudia Cappello, Marta Acin-Albiac, Daniela Pinto, Andrea Polo, Pasquale Filannino, Fabio Rinaldi, Marco Gobbetti, Raffaella Di Cagno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of probiotic lactobacilli in the treatment of vaginal infections:Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia Cappello *Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Marta Acin-Albiac *Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Daniela PintoHuman Microbiome Advanced Project, Research & Development, Milan, Italy. dpinto@giulianipharma.com.
Andrea PoloFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Pasquale FilanninoDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Fabio RinaldiHuman Microbiome Advanced Project, Research & Development, Milan, Italy.
Marco GobbettiFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Raffaella Di CagnoFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano · ITGiuliani (Italy) · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of this study was to create a multi-strain probiotic gel that would foster a lactobacilli-dominated vaginal microbiota in pregnant women and ensure appropriate eubiosis for the newborn. Nomadic lactobacilli (95 strains), mostly isolated from food sources, were preliminarily screened for functional traits before being characterized for their capability to inhibit the two vaginal pathogens Streptococcus agalactiae and Candida albicans, which may lead to adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Eight best-performing strains were chosen and furtherly investigated for their ability to produce biofilm. Lastly, the two selected potential probiotic candidates were analyzed in vitro for their ability to reduce the inflammation caused by C. albicans infection on the reconstituted human vaginal epithelium (HVE).

resultsLactiplantibacillus plantarum produced both isomers of lactic acid, while Lacticaseibacillus paracasei produced only L-isomer. The production of hydrogen peroxide was strain-dependent, with the highest concentrations found within Lact. paracasei strains. The auto-aggregation capacity and hydrophobicity traits were species-independent. S. agalactiae 88II3 was strongly inhibited both at pH 7.0 and 4.0, whereas the inhibition of C. albicans UNIBZ54 was less frequent. Overall, L. plantarum strains had the highest pathogen inhibition and functional scoring. L. plantarum C5 and POM1, which were selected as potential probiotic candidates also based on their ability to form biofilms, were able to counteract the inflammation process caused by C. albicans infection in the HVE model.

conclusionsOur multi-step and cumulative scoring-based approach was proven successful in mining and highlighting the probiotic potential of two nomadic lactobacilli strains (L. plantarum C5 and POM1), being applicable to preserve and improve human vaginal health.

Indexed as

LactobacillusProbioticsBacterial AdhesionCandida albicansFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInflammationPregnancyVaginaNomadic lactobacilliPathogens inhibition screeningProbioticsVaginal ecosystemVaginal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID36774510
PMCPMC9921609
OpenAlexW4320037521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.