Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36774502›Full record

ArticleMobile DNA2023

Mobility of mPing and its associated elements is regulated by both internal and terminal sequences.

Priscilla S Redd, Stephanie Diaz, David Weidner, Jazmine Benjamin, C Nathan Hancock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile DNA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Priscilla S ReddDepartment of Biology and Geology, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC, 29801, USA.
Stephanie DiazDepartment of Biology and Geology, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC, 29801, USA.
David WeidnerDepartment of Biology and Geology, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC, 29801, USA.
Jazmine BenjaminDepartment of Biology and Geology, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC, 29801, USA.
C Nathan HancockDepartment of Biology and Geology, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC, 29801, USA. nathanh@usca.edu.
University of South Carolina Aiken · USBroad Institute · USPediatric Nephrology of Alabama · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 1444581National Science Foundation 1651666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA transposable elements are mobilized by a "cut and paste" mechanism catalyzed by the binding of one or more transposase proteins to terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) to form a transpositional complex. Study of the rice genome indicates that the mPing element has experienced a recent burst in transposition compared to the closely related Ping and Pong elements. A previously developed yeast transposition assay allowed us to probe the role of both internal and terminal sequences in the mobilization of these elements.

resultsWe observed that mPing and a synthetic mPong element have significantly higher transposition efficiency than the related autonomous Ping and Pong elements. Systematic mutation of the internal sequences of both mPing and mPong identified multiple regions that promote or inhibit transposition. Simultaneous alteration of single bases on both mPing TIRs resulted in a significant reduction in transposition frequency, indicating that each base plays a role in efficient transposase binding. Testing chimeric mPing and mPong elements verified the important role of both the TIRs and internal regulatory regions. Previous experiments showed that the G at position 16, adjacent to the 5' TIR, allows mPing to have higher mobility. Alteration of the 16th and 17th base from mPing's 3' end or replacement of the 3' end with Pong 3' sequences significantly increased transposition frequency.

conclusionsAs the transposase proteins were consistent throughout this study, we conclude that the observed transposition differences are due to the element sequences. The presence of sub-optimal internal regions and TIR bases supports a model in which transposable elements self-limit their activity to prevent host damage and detection by host regulatory mechanisms. Knowing the role of the TIRs, adjacent sub-TIRs, and internal regulatory sequences allows for the creation of hyperactive elements.

Indexed as

mPingTerminal inverted repeatsTransposition complex

Identifiers

PMID36774502
PMCPMC9921582
OpenAlexW4320033501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.