Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36774481›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Interprofessional simulation of acute care for nursing and medical students: interprofessional competencies and transfer to the workplace.

Pepijn Krielen, Malon Meeuwsen, Edward C T H Tan, Jolanda H Schieving, Annelies J E M Ruijs, Nynke D Scherpbier

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06414629 (Implementation and Evaluation of Simulation-Based Mentorship Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06414629 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation and Evaluation of Simulation-Based Mentorship Program (SBMP) in Nepal Using the RE-AIM Framework

TypeinterventionalSponsorOne Heart WorldwideRan2020 to 2023Enrolled326ConditionsMaternal Health, Neonatal HealthArmsSimulation Based Mentorship Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pepijn KrielenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. pepijn.krielen@radboudumc.nl.
Malon MeeuwsenDepartment for Research in Learning and Education Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Edward C T H TanDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jolanda H SchievingDepartment of Child Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Annelies J E M RuijsDepartment for Research in Learning and Education Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nynke D ScherpbierDepartment of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeamwork and communication are essential tools for doctors, nurses and other team members in the management of critically ill patients. Early interprofessional education during study, using acute care simulation, may improve teamwork and communication between interprofessional team members on the long run.

methodsA comparative sequential quantitative-qualitative study was used to understand interprofessional learning outcomes in nursing and medical students after simulation of acute care. Students were assigned to a uni- or interprofessional training. Questionnaires were used to measure short and long term differences in interprofessional collaboration and communication between the intervention and control group for nursing and medical students respectively. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted to gain a better understanding of IPE in acute simulation.

resultsOne hundred and ninety-one students participated in this study (131 medical, 60 nursing students). No differences were found between the intervention and control group in overall ICCAS scores for both medical and nursing students (p = 0.181 and p = 0.441). There were no differences in ICS scores between the intervention and control group. Focus groups revealed growing competence in interprofessional communication and collaboration for both medical and nursing students.

conclusionsInterprofessional simulation training did show measurable growth of interprofessional competencies, but so did uniprofessional training. Both medical and nursing students reported increased awareness of perspective and expertise of own and other profession. Furthermore, they reported growing competence in interprofessional communication and collaboration in transfer to their workplace.

Indexed as

Simulation TrainingStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingAttitude of Health PersonnelComputer SimulationHumansInterprofessional RelationsLearningPatient Care TeamWorkplaceInterprofessional educationSimulation acute care

Identifiers

PMID36774481
PMCPMC9921059
OpenAlexW4320037330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.