Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36774471›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

A new inexpensive ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization simulation model.

Yan Liu, Jiemei Li, Jinzhu Chang, Shaoling Xiao, Wenbo Pei, Lei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Simulation-based learning in nephrology.Clinical kidney journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China.
Jiemei Li *Department of Anesthesiology, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China.
Jinzhu ChangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China.
Shaoling Xiao *Clinical Skills Center, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China.
Wenbo Pei *Department of Anesthesiology, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China. Wl13223551336@163.com.

Funding

the Shanxi Provincial Education department, China 2021YJJG314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral venous catheters (CVCs) are life-saving tools for fluid therapy during surgery. Ultrasound-guided CVC placement has been shown to be safe and highly efficient. However, it is difficult for medical workers with less experience in ultrasonography to acquire the necessary skill in a short time. Simulation-based training is a good way to enhance the skill of a beginner. Therefore, in this study, we introduced a new, inexpensive and easily implemented model for ultrasound-guided CVC placement training and assessed the feasibility of this model.

methodsThis was a quasi-experimental study. Thirty-three anaesthesiology postgraduate year 2 and 3 residents with strong CVC interest were included in a simulator-based training workshop in a department of anaesthesiology. The simulation model consisted of a piece of pork and two latex catheters filled with red and blue ink. The workshop comprised 3 parts: a 10-min introductory lecture, a 15-min orientation on performing ultrasound-guided CVC insertion based on the model, and a 30-min practice session. Participants completed relevant questionnaires before and after the training. Moreover, an examination was held to evaluate their skill with the novel model.

resultsAll participants indicated that the novel model increased their self-perceived confidence in ultrasound-guided catheterization. They also all reported that the model was adequate for training anaesthesiology residents in ultrasound-guided catheterization. A few individuals thought the model did not mimic the progress of CVC insertion (3 of 33). After training, participants did not show a significant difference in the acquisition of central venous catheterization theory. However, their competency with ultrasound-guided CVC placement was enhanced. This was demonstrated not only based on subjective answers to the following questions, namely, "how do you perform central venous catheterization with ultrasound guidance?" (p < 0.001), "can you perform ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization?" (p < 0.001), and "how much self-confidence do you have in performing ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization?" (p < 0.001), but also in objective performance (evaluation of the core step in ultrasound-guided placement (p < 0.001)).

conclusionThe new simulator is a feasible, inexpensive and easily reproducible tool for training anaesthesiologists in ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization. After the simulation-based training workshop, the competency of residents in performing central venous catheterization with ultrasound guidance improved.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersInternship and ResidencyEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansUltrasonographyUltrasonography, InterventionalCentral venous catheter (CVC)Medical educationSimulation trainingUltrasound model

Identifiers

PMID36774471
PMCPMC9921340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.