Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36774394›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The MyoPulser field stimulator, a do it yourself programmable electronic pacemaker for contracting cells and tissues.

Christiane Ott, Tobias Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christiane OttDepartment of Molecular Toxicology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE), Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany.
Tobias JungDepartment of Molecular Toxicology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE), Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany. tobias.jung@dife.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9159-8444

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After providing the free software MYOCYTER that analyzes a large amount of data from videos of contracting cells, tissues or organs, we now present an "Arduino"-based programmable, customizable and cost-effective electronic pacemaker ("MyoPulser") that triggers contraction by electric stimulation of the sample at arbitrary frequencies. In this work, construction, functions and application of the MyoPulser are explained in detail, the electronic pacemaker is also tested on isolated cardiomyocytes and HT22-cells to quantify biological effects of pacing. The device enables the user to select between different pulse types (monophasic, alternating, bi- and polyphasic) adjust the length of an applied pulse (1-200 ms), the gap between two consecutive pulses (20-2000 ms), application of irregular pulses with random length and gaps (simulation of arrhythmia) in a user-defined range, as well as manual pulsing, while extensive data are recorded for every single pulse during the experiment. Electrostimulation of isolated B6 cardiomyocytes showed very little deviation of the observed cellular contraction from the applied pulse settings of the device, while the carbon electrodes used proved to be biologically inert in long-term experiments. Due to the open source code and the expandable setup, the MyoPulser can be easily adapted to even highly specific requirements and together with the software MYOCYTER it represents a complete cardiomyophysiological measuring station.

Indexed as

Pacemaker, ArtificialSoftwareComputer SimulationElectronicsMyocytes, Cardiac

Identifiers

PMID36774394
PMCPMC9922332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.