ArticleLancet (London, England)2023
Conflicting COVID-19 excess mortality estimates.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reassessing Early COVID-19 Strategies in East Asia: Insights From Japan and Korea.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026Review
- Excess mortality in Europe estimated by EuroMOMO during the COVID-19 pandemic and previous influenza seasons.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Excess mortality from gastric cancer in Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020-2023.Epidemiology and health · 2026Article
- Understanding excess mortality in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
- Excess Deaths in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: 2020-2022.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024Article
- Comparative impact assessment of COVID-19 policy interventions in five South Asian countries using reported and estimated unreported death counts during 2020-2021.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.