ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2022
Approximately Half of Total Protein Intake by Adults Must be Animal-Based to Meet Nonprotein, Nutrient-Based Recommendations, With Variations Due to Age and Sex.
Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Culinary Spices on Liking and Consumption of Protein Rich Foods in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Nutrients · 2023Trial
- Carbon tunnel vision and sustainable meat production in the West: A disproportionate focus on dietary greenhouse gas emissions?Food science of animal resources · 2026Review
- A path to sustainable and healthy diets: modeling ovo-lacto-vegetarian food-based dietary guidelines.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Can Dietary Supplements Support Muscle Function and Physical Activity? A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- A framework for adequate nourishment: balancing nutrient density and food processing levels within the context of culturally and regionally appropriate diets.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2025Article
- Plant and Animal Protein Intake and Transitions From Multimorbidity to Frailty and Mortality in Older Adults.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Observational
- Galyean Appreciation Club review: knowledge gaps in the nutrition of grazing beef cattle.Journal of animal science · 2025Review
- Can micronutrient requirements be met by diets from sustainable sources: outcomes of dietary modelling studies using diet optimization.Annals of medicine · 2024Review
- Common questions and misconceptions about protein supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2024Review
- Circular food system approaches can support current European protein intake levels while reducing land use and greenhouse gas emissions.Nature food · 2024Article
- Impact of Plant Protein Intakes on Nutrient Adequacy in the US.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Association of dietary protein intake, inflammation with muscle mass, physical performance and incident sarcopenia in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2024Article
- Perspective: science and the future of livestock industries.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Environmental pressures and pesticide exposure associated with an increase in the share of plant-based foods in the diet.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Datasets on the nutritional and environmental (including biodiversity) characteristics of food products consumed in France.Data in brief · 2023Article
- Perspective: Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Can Help Facilitate and Maintain a Lower Animal to Plant Protein Intake Ratio.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Plant to animal protein ratio in the diet: nutrient adequacy, long-term health and environmental pressure.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShifting towards a more plant-based diet, as promoted in Western countries, will reduce the animal protein contribution to total proteins. Such a reduction may not only impair protein adequacy, but also the adequacy in other nutrients.
objectivesWe determined, for different adult subpopulations, the minimum total protein levels and the minimum animal protein contributions to total proteins that are compatible with the fulfillment of all nonprotein nutrient-based recommendations.
methodsMean nutritional contents and mean diet costs were estimated using a French, cross-sectional, representative survey for 5 French subpopulations: 1) women < 50 y; 2) women 50-64 y; 3) women ≥ 65 y; 4) men < 65 y; and 5) men ≥ 65 y. For each subpopulation, linear programming optimization was used to assess the minimum protein level (model set #1) and the minimum animal protein contribution to total proteins (model set #2) that are compatible with the fulfillment of all nutrient-based recommendations (except proteins, for which levels were analyzed as outputs). Total diet costs were not allowed to increase. Eating habits were considered in model set #2 only.
resultsThe minimum amount of protein that was theoretically compatible with the fulfillment of nutrient-based recommendations (model set #1) was below the minimum recommended protein intake for all subpopulations except women < 50 y. In model set #2, for women and men ≥ 65 y, decreasing animal protein contributions to total proteins below 55% and 60%, respectively, led to protein levels below recommended levels. For the other subpopulations (women < 50 y, women 50-64 y, and men < 65 y), the lowest animal protein contributions to total proteins compatible with a nutritionally adequate diet (including protein adequacy) were 55%, 50%, and 45%, respectively.
conclusionsThis study provides factual information about the animal protein contributions to total proteins compatible with meeting all nutrient-based recommendations at no additional cost, and shows that they vary between 45% and 60% depending on the group of adults considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.