Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36773514›Full record

Observational studyInternational emergency nursing2023

The emergency nurse responses to triage interruptions and how these responses are perceived by patients: An observational, prospective study.

Dania M Abu-Alhaija, Kimberly D Johnson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International emergency nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dania M Abu-AlhaijaUniversity of Cincinnati, College of Nursing, 3110 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States. Electronic address: dania.abu-alhaija@uc.edu.
Kimberly D JohnsonUniversity of Cincinnati, College of Nursing, 3110 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States. Electronic address: Kimberly.johnson2@uc.edu.

Funding

KL2 Training ProgramKL2TR001426 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI ZELLER, MARGARET H · 2015 to 2024
$6.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare providers' responses to triage interruptions in the emergency department affect quality of care. The purposes for this study were to (1) Examine the relationship between nurses' response to triage interruption and each of, patients' perceived confidence in nurses' technical skills, perceived competence of triage nurse, and satisfaction with the triage experience, (2) Examine the relationship between nurses' response to triage interruption and nurse demographics.

methodsUsing an observational, prospective design, this study was conducted in an adult academic level 1 trauma center. Data collection tools were: The Triage Interruptions Assessment Tool, Triage and Provider Satisfaction and Confidence Survey, and Demographic Questionnaire.

resultsThe number of observed triage interviews is 93. Of them, 66 interviews were interrupted. No significant relationships were found between nurses' response to the interruption and patients' perceived confidence in nurses' technical skills, competence of triage nurse, or satisfaction with triage experience. There were no significant relationships between nurses' response to triage interruptions and nurses' demographics.

conclusionsTriage interruptions in the emergency environment are common and most often result in delays in care. In the current study, this has not been shown to affect patients' satisfaction. Nurses' individual characteristics did not affect their responses to triage interruptions.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalTriageAdultHealth PersonnelHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergency nursingInterruptions in triage nursingpatient perception of carePatient satisfactionTriage interruptionsTriage patient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID36773514
PMCPMC10082689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.