Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36773319›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2023

Paternity through use of assisted reproduction technology in male adult and childhood cancer survivors: a nationwide register study.

Michael Kitlinski, Aleksander Giwercman, Angel Elenkov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Michael KitlinskiFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7151-168X
Aleksander GiwercmanDepartment of Translational Medicine, Clinical Research Centre, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5816-0785
Angel ElenkovDepartment of Translational Medicine, Clinical Research Centre, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5293-1016
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionHow does a history of cancer affect the likelihood of using assisted reproduction in order to achieve paternity? SUMMARY ANSWER: As compared to men with no history of cancer, use of assisted reproduction to achieve paternity was more frequent in fathers with a history of cancer, mainly those with testicular, prostate, and hematological and lymphatic malignancies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although it is well known that different types of cancer and their treatment may have a negative impact on fertility, there is a lack of data regarding the use of IVF and ICSI among male cancer survivors. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this population-based nation-wide study using the Swedish Medical Birth Register, we identified all men who fathered their first-born child in Sweden between 1994 and 2014. Using personal identification numbers, anonymized data from the Swedish National Quality of Assisted Reproduction Register, Swedish Cancer Register, Swedish Multi-generation Register, and Swedish Education Register were linked with the Swedish Medical Birth Register. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsDuring the study period, a total of 1 181 488 men fathering their first-born child were identified. Of these, 26 901 fathers had a cancer diagnosis. Fathers diagnosed with cancer with <12 months from offspring conception, or with a cancer diagnosis after offspring conception, were excluded (n = 21 529). The remaining fathers who had a history of cancer (n = 5372) were divided into three groups based on age at cancer diagnosis (<15, ≥15 and <24, or ≥24 years). For subgroup analyses, they were also grouped according to the cancer location using ICD-7 codes. The fathers with no cancer diagnosis (n = 1 154 587), were included as controls. In total, 1 159 959 men were included. Associations between IVF/ICSI use and history of cancer were evaluated using logistic regression models, unadjusted and adjusted for paternal education, fathers age at childbirth, and year of conception, yielding crude and adjusted odds ratio (aOR), respectively, with a 95% CI. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: As compared to controls, childhood cancer survivors were only more likely to achieve paternity through ICSI (aOR 3.52, 95% CI 2.52-4.93; P < 0.001) but not through IVF treatment (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.61-1.70; P = 0.955). Similarly, teenage and young adult cancer survivors were more likely to father through ICSI treatment (aOR 6.84, 95% CI 5.64-8.30; P < 0.001) but not using IVF (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 0.90-1.80; P = 0.17). However, adult cancer survivors were more likely to conceive through either ICSI (aOR 5.52, 95% CI 4.86-6.27; P < 0.001) or IVF treatment (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.60; P = 0.004). In subgroup analyses, childhood survivors of testicular cancer (aOR 5.15, 95% CI 1.20-22.0; P = 0.027), soft tissue and bone cancers (aOR 4.70, 2.13-10.4; P < 0.001), hematological and lymphatic cancers (aOR 4.49, 95% CI 2.72-7.40; P < 0.001), or central nervous system (CNS) and eye cancers (aOR 2.64, 95% CI 1.23-5.67; P = 0.012), were at an increased likelihood of fathering through ICSI. Teenage and young adult survivors of testicular cancer (aOR 15.4, 95% CI 11.5-20.7; P < 0.001), hematological and lymphatic cancers (aOR 9.84, 95% CI 6.93-14.0; P < 0.001), or soft tissue and bone cancers (aOR 6.83, 95% CI 3.53-13.2; P < 0.001) were more likely to father through ICSI treatment. Adult survivors of prostate cancer (aOR 15.7, 95% CI 6.70-36.9; P < 0.001), testicular cancer (aOR 9.54, 95% CI 7.81-11.7; P < 0.001), hematological and lymphatic cancers (aOR 11.3, 95% CI 8.63-14.9; P < 0.001), digestive, respiratory, and urogenital tract cancers (aOR 2.62, 95% CI 1.75-3.92; P < 0.001), CNS and eye cancers (aOR 2.74, 95% CI 1.48-5.08; P = 0.001), or skin cancer (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.08-2.62; P = 0.022) were more likely to father through ICSI treatment. Only teenage and young adult survivors of hematological and lymphatic cancers (aOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.10-3.56; P = 0.022) and adult survivors of testicular cancer (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.37-2.58; P < 0.001) were significantly more likely to achieve fatherhood using IVF treatment. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Information on men failing to father children was not available, and thus our results cannot estimate the risk of infertility in men with a history of cancer. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsUse of ART, in particular ICSI, was significantly more frequent in fathers with malignancies of the male reproductive tract or hematological and lymphatic systems. Our findings highlight which groups of male cancer survivors would benefit from access to fertility care, thereby improving future fertility treatment policies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study received funding from the Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Childhood Cancer Society, and the Swedish Government Fund for Clinical Research. There are no competing interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsEye NeoplasmsTesticular NeoplasmsAdolescentChildFertilizationFertilization in VitroHumansMaleNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalPaternitySperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTechnologyYoung Adultassisted reproductionICSIIVFmale cancer survivorsmale infertility

Identifiers

PMID36773319
PMCPMC10228784
OpenAlexW4320034884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.