Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36773060›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2023

Association between vascular risk factors and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a Mendelian randomization study.

Ziang Deng, Haoxiang Wang, Keru Huang, Yuanyou Li, Yang Ran, Yaxing Chen, Liangxue Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic Risk Factors in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: What We Know and What Is Next.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Glymphatics for the Neurosurgeon.Neurosurgery practice · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ziang Deng *Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9604-7502
Haoxiang Wang *Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Keru HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuanyou LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yang RanDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yaxing ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Liangxue ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. zhlxlll@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9991-6358
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePatients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) have a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes. However, the causal effects of these vascular risk factors on iNPH remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the causal relationship between vascular risk factors (VRFs) and iNPH.

methodsWe conducted the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis of iNPH. We included nineteen vascular risk factors related to hypertension, diabetes, lipids, obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, sleep, and cardiovascular events as exposure factors. We used the inverse-variance weighted method for causal effect estimation and weighted median, maximum likelihood, and MR Egger regression methods for sensitivity analyses.

resultsWe found that genetically predicting essential hypertension (OR = 1.608 (1.330-1.944), p = 0.013) and increased sleep duration (OR = 16.395 (5.624-47.799), p = 0.009) were associated with higher odds of iNPH. Type 1 diabetes (OR = 0.869 (0.828-0.913), p = 0.004) was associated with lower odds of iNPH. For the other 16 VRFs, there was no evidence that they were significantly associated with iNPH. Sensitivity analyses showed that essential hypertension and type 1 diabetes were significantly associated with iNPH.

conclusionIn our MR study on VRFs and iNPH, we found essential hypertension to be a causal risk factor for iNPH. This suggests that hypertension may be involved in the pathophysiological mechanism of iNPH.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Hydrocephalus, Normal PressureHypertensionEssential HypertensionGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisRisk FactorsDiabetesHypertensionIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusMendelian randomizationVascular risk factors

Identifiers

PMID36773060
OpenAlexW4320033078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.