Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36773057›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

A practical guide to the development and deployment of deep learning models for the orthopedic surgeon: part II.

Jacob F Oeding, Riley J Williams, Christopher L Camp, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, Bryan T Kelly, Danyal H Nawabi, Jón Karlsson, Andrew D Pearle, R Kyle Martin, Seong J Jang and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence agents in orthopaedics: Concepts, capabilities and the road ahead.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Machine-learning models for shoulder rehabilitation exercises classification using a wearable system.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  9. Achieving high accuracy in meniscus tear detection using advanced deep learning models with a relatively small data set.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jacob F OedingSchool of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Riley J WilliamsSports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Christopher L CampDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joaquin Sanchez-SoteloDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Bryan T KellySports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Danyal H NawabiSports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jón KarlssonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Andrew D PearleSports Medicine and Shoulder Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
R Kyle MartinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Seong J JangWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Ayoosh PareekOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sports Science, Oslo, Norway. ayooshp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-1697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has the potential to be one of the most transformative technologies to impact orthopedic surgery. Substantial innovation in this area has occurred over the past 5 years, but clinically meaningful advancements remain limited by a disconnect between clinical and technical experts. That is, it is likely that few orthopedic surgeons possess both the clinical knowledge necessary to identify orthopedic problems, and the technical knowledge needed to implement deep learning-based solutions. To maximize the utilization of rapidly advancing technologies derived from deep learning models, orthopedic surgeons should understand the steps needed to design, organize, implement, and evaluate a deep learning project and its workflow. Equipping surgeons with this knowledge is the objective of this three-part editorial review. Part I described the processes involved in defining the problem, team building, data acquisition, curation, labeling, and establishing the ground truth. Building on that, this review (Part II) provides guidance on pre-processing and augmenting the data, making use of open-source libraries/toolkits, and selecting the required hardware to implement the pipeline. Special considerations regarding model training and evaluation unique to deep learning models relative to "shallow" machine learning models are also reviewed. Finally, guidance pertaining to the clinical deployment of deep learning models in the real world is provided. As in Part I, the focus is on applications of deep learning for computer vision and imaging.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOrthopedic SurgeonsSurgeonsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningAIArtificial intelligenceDeep learningImagingMachine learningModel deploymentUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.