Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36773051›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2023

Hydroxyapatite-coated compared with stainless steel external fixation pins did not show impact in the rate of pin track infection: a multicenter prospective study.

Cristhopher Stoffel, Everton de Lima, Mauro José Salles

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. In-vitro external fixation pin-site model proof of concept: A novel approach to studying wound healing in transcutaneous implants.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. [Comparative study of external fixator combined with Kirschner wire fixation and Kirschner wires fixation in treatment of cubitus varus deformity in children].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristhopher StoffelFoot and Ankle Surgical Servic, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Institute, São Vicente de Paulo Hospital, Rua Uruguay 2050, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP: 99010-110, Passo Fundo, Brazil. cristoffel@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0403-1819
Everton de LimaFoot and Ankle Surgical Servic, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Institute, São Vicente de Paulo Hospital, Rua Uruguay 2050, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP: 99010-110, Passo Fundo, Brazil.
Mauro José SallesInfectious Diseases Discipline, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5443-6024
Hospital São Vicente · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInfection at the pin site remains the most common complication of external fixators (EFs). It is known that hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated pins increase bone adhesion and may lead to reduced rates of reported infections. The present study compares the rates of pin track infection associated with stainless steel and HA-coated pins.

methodsThis is a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, comparative intervention study among patients undergoing surgical treatment with EFs of any type between April 2018 and October 2021. Patients were followed up until the removal of the EF, or the end of the study period (ranging from 1 to 27.6 months). The definition of pin track infection was based upon the Maz-Oxford-Nuffield (MON) pin infection grading system.

resultsOverall, 132 patients undergoing external fixation surgery were included. Of these, 94 (71.2%) were male, with a mean age of 36.9 years (SD ± 18.9). Infection of any type (score > 1) was observed in 63 (47.7%) patients. Coated and uncoated-pin track-infection occurred in 45.7% and 48.5% of patients, respectively (P= 0.0887). The probability of developing infection (defined as a score ≥ 2) adjusted for comorbidities and follow-up time was not statistically higher among those who received uncoated pins compared to those who received pins coated with HA (odds ratio (OR) = 1.56, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.67-3.67, p <0.05).

conclusionIn the present study, the external fixator pin infection rates were similar when using HA coating and standard steel pins.

Indexed as

DurapatiteExternal FixatorsAdultBone NailsFemaleFracture FixationHumansMaleProspective StudiesStainless SteelDurapatiteStainless SteelCoated pinExternal fixatorHydroxyapatitePin insertion site infectionStainless steel pin

Identifiers

PMID36773051
PMCPMC9918829
OpenAlexW4320032502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.