Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36773039›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Effects of Aspergillus oryzae prebiotic on animal performance, nutrients digestibility, and feeding behavior of backgrounding beef heifers fed with either a sorghum silage- or a byproducts-based diet.

Federico Podversich, Federico Tarnonsky, Juan M Bollatti, Gleise M Silva, Tessa M Schulmeister, Juan J Vargas Martinez, Daniella Heredia, Ignacio R Ipharraguerre, Fernando Bargo, Angela Gonella-Diaza and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The postbiotic potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Federico PodversichNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0852-790X
Federico TarnonskyNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-1956
Juan M BollattiNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.
Gleise M SilvaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5, Canada.
Tessa M SchulmeisterNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-7442
Juan J Vargas MartinezNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.
Daniella HerediaNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-743X
Ignacio R IpharraguerreInstitute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, University of Kiel, Kiel 24118, Germany.
Fernando BargoBiozyme Inc., St. Joseph, MO 64504, USA.
Angela Gonella-DiazaNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.
Jose C B DubeuxNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.
Luiz F FerrarettoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4711-8332
Nicolas DiLorenzoNorth Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-3427
University of Florida · USBioZyme (United States) · USChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eighty-four Angus crossbred heifers (13 ± 1 mo of age, 329.5 ± 61.92 kg of body weight [BW]) were used in a generalized randomized block design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. The factors evaluated were: 1) diet type (whole plant sorghum silage [SS] vs. byproducts-based [BP]), and 2) feed additive: Aspergillus oryzae prebiotic (AOP; 2 g/d) vs. Negative control (CTL; 0 g/d), resulting in four treatments: sorghum silage-control (SC), sorghum silage-AOP (SA), byproducts-control (BC), and byproducts-AOP (BA). Heifers were stratified by body weight (BW), randomly assigned to treatments (21 heifers per treatment) and housed in 12 pens equipped with two GrowSafe feed bunks each to measure individual dry matter intake (DMI). After a 14-d adaptation, BW was measured every 14 d for 56 d. Chewing activity was monitored through collar-mounted HR-Tags (heat-related tags). Following the performance period, apparent total tract digestibility was measured in 40 heifers, using indigestible neutral detergent fiber as a marker. Heifers fed with the BP diets had greater DMI (2.92% vs. 2.59% of BW, P < 0.01) and average daily gain (ADG; 1.16 vs. 0.68 kg, P ≤ 0.01) than heifers fed with SS diets. Compared with BP-fed animals, heifers consuming the SS diets had 23 more visits/d to the feed bunks (P ≤ 0.01), consumed 53% less dry matter on each visit (P ≤ 0.01), and spent 39% more min chewing/d and 63% more min chewing/kg of DMI (P ≤ 0.01). However, chewing measured in min/kg of neutral detergent fiber intake was not affected by treatment (average 111.3 min/kg of NDF intake). Feeding AOP improved gain:feed (GF) by 15% in BP-fed heifers (0.120 vs. 0.104 kg/kg; P < 0.05). Inclusion of AOP increased organic matter digestibility (OMD) in SS diets (55.88% vs. 49.83%; P < 0.01), whereas it decreased OMD in BP diets (61.67% vs. 65.77%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, ADG and GF of BP-fed heifers was greater than SS-fed heifers, and GF was greater with AOP supplementation in BP-fed heifers. Improvement in GF in BP-fed heifers was likely not related to differences in nutrient digestibility as AOP inclusion did not enhance digestibility in the BP diet. Additionally, the effects of the AOP inclusion appear to be diet-dependent, where the 15% improvement in GF by AOP occurred in heifers fed with the more fermentable diet. Therefore, further research should explore the mechanisms responsible for the observed improvements in growth performance when feeding AOP to BP-fed heifers.

Indexed as

Aspergillus oryzaeSorghumAnimal FeedAnimalsBody WeightCattleDetergentsDietDietary FiberDigestionEdible GrainFeeding BehaviorFemaleNutrientsPrebioticsSilageDetergentsDietary FiberNutrientsPrebioticsAspergillus oryzae prebioticbeef cattlebyproductsheifersorghum silage

Identifiers

PMID36773039
PMCPMC9922046
OpenAlexW4320033062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.