ArticleAnnals of medicine2023
Ipatasertib, an oral AKT inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin exhibits anti-proliferative effects in uterine serous carcinoma.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in prostate cancer: Molecular dysregulation, therapeutic advances, and future directions.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026Review
- A nomogram for predicting prognosis in uterine serous carcinoma: a large population-based cohort study with external validation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The Role of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Axis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Proteomic Assessment of SKBR3/HER2+ Breast Cancer Cellular Response to Lapatinib and Investigational Ipatasertib Kinase Inhibitors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Molecular Targeting of the Phosphoinositide-3-Protein Kinase (PI3K) Pathway across Various Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Proteomic assessment of SKBR3/HER2+ breast cancer cellular response to Lapatinib and investigational Ipatasertib kinase inhibitors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Emerging molecular therapies in the treatment of bladder cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUterine serous carcinoma (USC) exhibits worse survival rates compared to the endometrioid subtype, and there is currently no effective treatment options for recurrence of this disease after platinum-based chemotherapy. Activation of PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is a common biological feature in USC. MATERIALS AND
methodsIpatasertib (IPAT) is an investigational, orally administered, ATP-competitive, highly selective inhibitor of pan AKT that has demonstrated anti-proliferative activity in a variety of tumor cells and tumor models. In this study, we used IPAT, carboplatin and their combination to investigate the anti-tumor activity in SPEC-2 and ARK-1 cells.
resultsOur results indicate that IPAT combined with carboplatin at low doses was more effective at reducing proliferation, inducing apoptosis and causing cellular stress than IPAT or carboplatin alone. In particular, inhibition of the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway and induction of DNA damage were involved in the synergistic inhibition by combination treatment of cell viability in USC cells treated with the combination. Furthermore, IPAT in combination with carboplatin significantly reduced cell adhesion and inhibited cell invasion.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that the combination of IPAT and carboplatin has potential clinical implications for developing new USC treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.