Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772872›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments.

Ian Geddes Berlin, Charity Conlin Jennings, Spencer Shin, Jason Kenealey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian Geddes BerlinDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Charity Conlin JenningsDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Spencer ShinDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Jason KenealeyDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1170-8736
Brigham Young University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PC) is estimated to cause 13.1% of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2021. Natural bioactive compounds have drawn the interest of researchers worldwide in their efforts to find novel treatments for PC. Many of these bioactive compounds have been identified from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) remedies often containing multiple bioactive compounds. However, in vitro studies frequently focus on the compounds in isolation.

aimWe used mixture design response surface methodology (MDRSM) to assess changes in PC cell viability after 48 h of treatment to identify the optimal mixture of all 35 three-compound combinations of seven bioactive compounds from TCM. METHODS AND

resultsWe used berberine, wogonin, shikonin, curcumin, triptolide, emodin, and silybin to treat PC3 and LNCaP human PC cells at their IC50 concentrations that we calculated. These compounds modulate many chemotherapeutic pathways including intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, increasing reactive oxygen species, decreasing metastatic pathways, inhibiting cell cycle progression. We hypothesize that because these compounds bind to unique molecular targets to activate different chemotherapeutic pathways, they will act synergistically to decrease tumor cell viability. Results from MDRSM showed that two-way combinations were more effective than three-way or single compounds. Most notably wogonin, silybin, emodin and berberine responded well in two-compound combinations with each other in PC3 and LNCaP cells. We then conducted cell viability tests combining two bioactive compound ratios with docetaxel (Doc) and found significant results within the LNCaP cell line. In particular, mixtures of berberine and wogonin, berberine and silybin, emodin and berberine, and emodin and silybin reduced LNCaP cell viability up to an average of 90.02%. The two-compound combinations were significantly better than docetaxel treatment of LNCaP cells.

conclusionWithin the PC3 cells, we show that a combination of berberine, wogonin and docetaxel is just as effective as docetaxel alone. Thus, we provide new combination treatments that are highly effective in vitro for treating androgen-dependent and androgen-independent PC.

Indexed as

BerberineEmodinProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogensCell Line, TumorDocetaxelHumansMalePhytochemicalsSilybinAndrogensBerberineDocetaxelEmodinPhytochemicalsSilybinberberinecurcuminemodinmixture design response surface methodology (MDRSM)prostate cancerShikoninsilybintraditional Chinese medicine (TCM)triptolidewogonin

Identifiers

PMID36772872
PMCPMC10075293
OpenAlexW4320032994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.