ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilizing mixture design response surface methodology to determine effective combinations of plant derived compounds as prostate cancer treatments.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PC) is estimated to cause 13.1% of all new cancer cases in the United States in 2021. Natural bioactive compounds have drawn the interest of researchers worldwide in their efforts to find novel treatments for PC. Many of these bioactive compounds have been identified from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) remedies often containing multiple bioactive compounds. However, in vitro studies frequently focus on the compounds in isolation.
aimWe used mixture design response surface methodology (MDRSM) to assess changes in PC cell viability after 48 h of treatment to identify the optimal mixture of all 35 three-compound combinations of seven bioactive compounds from TCM. METHODS AND
resultsWe used berberine, wogonin, shikonin, curcumin, triptolide, emodin, and silybin to treat PC3 and LNCaP human PC cells at their IC50 concentrations that we calculated. These compounds modulate many chemotherapeutic pathways including intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, increasing reactive oxygen species, decreasing metastatic pathways, inhibiting cell cycle progression. We hypothesize that because these compounds bind to unique molecular targets to activate different chemotherapeutic pathways, they will act synergistically to decrease tumor cell viability. Results from MDRSM showed that two-way combinations were more effective than three-way or single compounds. Most notably wogonin, silybin, emodin and berberine responded well in two-compound combinations with each other in PC3 and LNCaP cells. We then conducted cell viability tests combining two bioactive compound ratios with docetaxel (Doc) and found significant results within the LNCaP cell line. In particular, mixtures of berberine and wogonin, berberine and silybin, emodin and berberine, and emodin and silybin reduced LNCaP cell viability up to an average of 90.02%. The two-compound combinations were significantly better than docetaxel treatment of LNCaP cells.
conclusionWithin the PC3 cells, we show that a combination of berberine, wogonin and docetaxel is just as effective as docetaxel alone. Thus, we provide new combination treatments that are highly effective in vitro for treating androgen-dependent and androgen-independent PC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.