Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772765›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Evaluation of Geometric Data Registration of Small Objects from Non-Invasive Techniques: Applicability to the HBIM Field.

Juan Moyano, Elena Cabrera-Revuelta, Juan E Nieto-Julián, María Fernández-Alconchel, Pedro Fernández-Valderrama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan MoyanoDepartment of Graphical Expression and Building Engineering, University of Seville, Ave. Reina Mercedes, 4A, 41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2186-6159
Elena Cabrera-RevueltaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Design, University of Cádiz, 10 Avenue Puerto Real, 11510 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2743-5576
Juan E Nieto-JuliánDepartment of Graphical Expression and Building Engineering, University of Seville, Ave. Reina Mercedes, 4A, 41012 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1413-3811
María Fernández-AlconchelDepartment of Graphical Expression and Building Engineering, University of Seville, Ave. Reina Mercedes, 4A, 41012 Seville, Spain.
Pedro Fernández-ValderramaDepartment of Graphical Expression and Building Engineering, University of Seville, Ave. Reina Mercedes, 4A, 41012 Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse engineering and the creation of digital twins are advantageous for documenting, cataloging, and maintenance control tracking in the cultural heritage field. Digital copies of the objects into Building Information Models (BIM) add cultural interest to every artistic work. Low-cost 3D sensors, particularly structured-light scanners, have evolved towards multiple uses in the entertainment market but also as data acquisition and processing techniques for research purposes. Nowadays, with the development of structured-light data capture technologies, the geometry of objects can be recorded in high-resolution 3D datasets at a very low cost. On this basis, this research addresses a small artifact with geometric singularities that is representative of small museum objects. For this, the precision of two structured-light scanners is compared with that of the photogrammetric technique based on short-range image capture: a high-cost Artec Spider 3D scanner, and the low-cost Revopoint POP 3D scanner. Data capture accuracy is evaluated through a mathematical algorithm and point set segmentation to verify the spatial resolution. In addition, the precision of the 3D model is studied through a vector analysis in a BIM environment, an unprecedented analysis until now. The work evaluates the accuracy of the devices through algorithms and the study of point density at the submillimeter scale. Although the results of the 3D geometry may vary in a morphometric analysis depending on the device records, the results demonstrate similar accuracies in that submillimeter range. Photogrammetry achieved an accuracy of 0.70 mm versus the Artec Spider and 0.57 mm against the Revopoint POP 3D scanner.

Indexed as

3D optical scannerBIM small objectcultural heritagepoint cloudsculpturestructured-light systems

Identifiers

PMID36772765
PMCPMC9921290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.