Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772683›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Measure of Motion Similarity for Robotics Application.

Teresa Zielinska, Gabriel Coba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teresa ZielinskaFaculty of Power And Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-0875
Gabriel CobaIndependent Researcher, Quito 17203, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new measure of motion similarity has been proposed. The formulation of this measure is presented and its logical basis is described. Unlike in most of other methods, the measure enables easy determination of the instantaneous synergies of the motion of body parts. To demonstrate how to use the measure, the data describing human movement is used. The movement is recorded using a professional motion capture system. Two different cases of non-periodic movements are discussed: stepping forward and backward, and returning to a stable posture after an unexpected thrust to the side (hands free or tied). This choice enables the identification of synergies in slow dynamics (stepping) and in fast dynamics (push recovery). The trajectories of motion similarity measures are obtained for point masses of the human body. The interpretation of these trajectories in relation to motion events is discussed. In addition, ordinary motion trajectories and footprints are shown in order to better illustrate the specificity of the discussed examples. The article ends with a discussion and conclusions.

Indexed as

human motionmotion synergytrajectories comparison

Identifiers

PMID36772683
PMCPMC9919200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.