Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772638›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Predicting Emotion with Biosignals: A Comparison of Classification and Regression Models for Estimating Valence and Arousal Level Using Wearable Sensors.

Pekka Siirtola, Satu Tamminen, Gunjan Chandra, Anusha Ihalapathirana, Juha Röning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pekka SiirtolaBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4500, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5995-5421
Satu TamminenBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4500, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-6889
Gunjan ChandraBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4500, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0051-0268
Anusha IhalapathiranaBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4500, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.
Juha RöningBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4500, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9993-8602

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to predict emotions using biosignals collected via wrist-worn sensor and evaluate the performance of different prediction models. Two dimensions of emotions were considered: valence and arousal. The data collected by the sensor were used in conjunction with target values obtained from questionnaires. A variety of classification and regression models were compared, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models. Additionally, the effects of different normalization methods and the impact of using different sensors were studied, and the way in which the results differed between the study subjects was analyzed. The results revealed that regression models generally performed better than classification models, with LSTM regression models achieving the best results. The normalization method called baseline reduction was found to be the most effective, and when used with an LSTM-based regression model it achieved high accuracy in detecting valence (mean square error = 0.43 and R2-score = 0.71) and arousal (mean square error = 0.59 and R2-score = 0.81). Moreover, it was found that even if all biosignals were not used in the training phase, reliable models could be obtained; in fact, for certain study subjects the best results were obtained using only a few of the sensors.

Indexed as

EmotionsWearable Electronic DevicesArousalHumansWristWrist Jointarousalclassificationemotion detectionmachine learningregressionvalencewearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID36772638
PMCPMC9920941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.