Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772636›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Face Mask Identification Using Spatial and Frequency Features in Depth Image from Time-of-Flight Camera.

Xiaoyan Wang, Tianxu Xu, Dong An, Lei Sun, Qiang Wang, Zhongqi Pan, Yang Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Review on Face Mask Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Advances in Silicon-Based Integrated Lidar.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoyan WangInstitute of Modern Optics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Tianxu XuNational Center for International Joint Research of Electronic Materials and Systems, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Dong AnInstitute of Modern Optics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
Lei SunShphotonics, LLC, Tianjin 300450, China.
Qiang WangAngle AI (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300450, China.
Zhongqi PanDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2325-2254
Yang YueSchool of Information and Communications Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China.

Funding

Key 366 Technologies R&D Program of Tianjin 20YFZCGX00440National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFB1803700Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Deep 367 Space Exploration Intelligent Information Technology 2021SYS-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Face masks can effectively prevent the spread of viruses. It is necessary to determine the wearing condition of masks in various locations, such as traffic stations, hospitals, and other places with a risk of infection. Therefore, achieving fast and accurate identification in different application scenarios is an urgent problem to be solved. Contactless mask recognition can avoid the waste of human resources and the risk of exposure. We propose a novel method for face mask recognition, which is demonstrated using the spatial and frequency features from the 3D information. A ToF camera with a simple system and robust data are used to capture the depth images. The facial contour of the depth image is extracted accurately by the designed method, which can reduce the dimension of the depth data to improve the recognition speed. Additionally, the classification process is further divided into two parts. The wearing condition of the mask is first identified by features extracted from the facial contour. The types of masks are then classified by new features extracted from the spatial and frequency curves. With appropriate thresholds and a voting method, the total recall accuracy of the proposed algorithm can achieve 96.21%. Especially, the recall accuracy for images without mask can reach 99.21%.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionMasksAlgorithmsHumansRecognition, PsychologySARS-CoV-23D data processingdepth cameraface mask identification

Identifiers

PMID36772636
PMCPMC9918995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.