ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Machine-Learning-Based Methodology for Estimation of Shoulder Load in Wheelchair-Related Activities Using Wearables.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between generative AI use frequency, technology acceptance, attitudes toward AI, and reported learning preference patterns among students in physical education classes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Sliding-Window CNN + Channel-Time Attention Transformer Network Trained with Inertial Measurement Units and Surface Electromyography Data for the Prediction of Muscle Activation and Motion Dynamics Leveraging IMU-Only Wearables for Home-Based Shoulder Rehabilitation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Kinematics-Based Predictions of External Loads during Handcycling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Machine Learning for Optical Motion Capture-Driven Musculoskeletal Modelling from Inertial Motion Capture Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a high prevalence of shoulder problems in manual wheelchair users (MWUs) with a spinal cord injury. How shoulder load relates to shoulder problems remains unclear. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning-based methodology to estimate the shoulder load in wheelchair-related activities of daily living using wearable sensors. Ten able-bodied participants equipped with five inertial measurement units (IMU) on their thorax, right arm, and wheelchair performed activities exemplary of daily life of MWUs. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the long head of the biceps and medial part of the deltoid. A neural network was trained to predict the shoulder load based on IMU and EMG data. Different cross-validation strategies, sensor setups, and model architectures were examined. The predicted shoulder load was compared to the shoulder load determined with musculoskeletal modeling. A subject-specific biLSTM model trained on a sparse sensor setup yielded the most promising results (mean correlation coefficient = 0.74 ± 0.14, relative root-mean-squared error = 8.93% ± 2.49%). The shoulder-load profiles had a mean similarity of 0.84 ± 0.10 over all activities. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using wearable sensors and neural networks to estimate the shoulder load in wheelchair-related activities of daily living.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.