Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772549›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Autonomous Intersection Management: Optimal Trajectories and Efficient Scheduling.

Abdeljalil Abbas-Turki, Yazan Mualla, Nicolas Gaud, Davide Calvaresi, Wendan Du, Alexandre Lombard, Mahjoub Dridi, Abder Koukam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdeljalil Abbas-TurkiCIAD UMR 7533, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UTBM, F-90010 Belfort, France.
Yazan MuallaCIAD UMR 7533, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UTBM, F-90010 Belfort, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6772-6135
Nicolas GaudCIAD UMR 7533, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UTBM, F-90010 Belfort, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8151-8650
Davide CalvaresiInstitute of Information Systems (IIG), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 3960 Sierre, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9816-7439
Wendan DuCIAD UMR 7533, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UTBM, F-90010 Belfort, France.
Alexandre LombardCIAD UMR 7533, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UTBM, F-90010 Belfort, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5107-6484
Mahjoub DridiCIAD UMR 7533, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UTBM, F-90010 Belfort, France.
Abder KoukamCIAD UMR 7533, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UTBM, F-90010 Belfort, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intersections are at the core of congestion in urban areas. After the end of the Second World War, the problem of intersection management has benefited from a growing body of advances to address the optimization of the traffic lights' phase splits, timing, and offset. These contributions have significantly improved traffic safety and efficiency in urban areas. However, with the growth of transportation demand and motorization, traffic lights show their limits. At the end of the 1990s, the perspective of autonomous and connected driving systems motivated researchers to introduce a paradigm shift for controlling intersections. This new paradigm is well known today as autonomous intersection management (AIM). It harnesses the self-organization ability of future vehicles to provide more accurate control approaches that use the smallest available time window to reach unprecedented traffic performances. This is achieved by optimizing two main points of the interaction of connected and autonomous vehicles at intersections: the motion control of vehicles and the schedule of their accesses. Considering the great potential of AIM and the complexity of the problem, the proposed approaches are very different, starting from various assumptions. With the increasing popularity of AIM, this paper provides readers with a comprehensive vision of noticeable advances toward enhancing traffic efficiency. It shows that it is possible to tailor vehicles' speed and schedule according to the traffic demand by using distributed particle swarm optimization. Moreover, it brings the most relevant contributions in the light of traffic engineering, where flow-speed diagrams are used to measure the impact of the proposed optimizations. Finally, this paper presents the current challenging issues to be addressed.

Indexed as

autonomous vehiclecooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS)cooperative intersection managementschedulingvirtual platooning

Identifiers

PMID36772549
PMCPMC9919423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.