Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772546›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Biometric Recognition: A Systematic Review on Electrocardiogram Data Acquisition Methods.

Teresa M C Pereira, Raquel C Conceição, Vitor Sencadas, Raquel Sebastião

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa M C PereiraIEETA, DETI, LASI, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-7468
Raquel C ConceiçãoInstituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0025-863X
Vitor SencadasInstituto de Materiais (CICECO), Departamento de Materiais e Cerâmica, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1986-1348
Raquel SebastiãoIEETA, DETI, LASI, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5717-1415
University of Aveiro · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia Scientific Employment Stimulus-Individual Call-CEECIND/03986/2018Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/00127/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/00645/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50011/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decades, researchers have shown the potential of using Electrocardiogram (ECG) as a biometric trait due to its uniqueness and hidden nature. However, despite the great number of approaches found in the literature, no agreement exists on the most appropriate methodology. This paper presents a systematic review of data acquisition methods, aiming to understand the impact of some variables from the data acquisition protocol of an ECG signal in the biometric identification process. We searched for papers on the subject using Scopus, defining several keywords and restrictions, and found a total of 121 papers. Data acquisition hardware and methods vary widely throughout the literature. We reviewed the intrusiveness of acquisitions, the number of leads used, and the duration of acquisitions. Moreover, by analyzing the literature, we can conclude that the preferable solutions include: (1) the use of off-the-person acquisitions as they bring ECG biometrics closer to viable, unconstrained applications; (2) the use of a one-lead setup; and (3) short-term acquisitions as they required fewer numbers of contact points, making the data acquisition of benefit to user acceptance and allow faster acquisitions, resulting in a user-friendly biometric system. Thus, this paper reviews data acquisition methods, summarizes multiple perspectives, and highlights existing challenges and problems. In contrast, most reviews on ECG-based biometrics focus on feature extraction and classification methods.

Indexed as

Biometric IdentificationBiometryBibliometricsElectrocardiographyHumansacquisition devicesacquisition methodsbiometricsdatabaseselectrocardiogram

Identifiers

PMID36772546
PMCPMC9921530
OpenAlexW4318464409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.