Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772543›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Contactless Cardiovascular Assessment by Imaging Photoplethysmography: A Comparison with Wearable Monitoring.

Valerie A A van Es, Richard G P Lopata, Enzo Pasquale Scilingo, Mimma Nardelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07502703 (Validation of Remote Photoplethysmography), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07502703 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Validation of Remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG)-Derived Cardiovascular Parameters Against Standard Clinical Measurements and Risk Scores in a Community-Based Population in Semanan, Jakarta

TypeobservationalSponsorTarumanagara UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsDyslipidemia, Angina (Stable), Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Heart Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valerie A A van EsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4946-6288
Richard G P LopataDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Enzo Pasquale ScilingoBioengineering and Robotics Research Centre E. Piaggio, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2588-4917
Mimma NardelliBioengineering and Robotics Research Centre E. Piaggio, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 1, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0453-7465

Funding

European Commission 824153Ministry of Education, Universities and Research CrossLab project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the notable recent developments in the field of remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), extracting a reliable pulse rate variability (PRV) signal still remains a challenge. In this study, eight image-based photoplethysmography (iPPG) extraction methods (GRD, AGRD, PCA, ICA, LE, SPE, CHROM, and POS) were compared in terms of pulse rate (PR) and PRV features. The algorithms were made robust for motion and illumination artifacts by using ad hoc pre- and postprocessing steps. Then, they were systematically tested on the public dataset UBFC-RPPG, containing data from 42 subjects sitting in front of a webcam (30 fps) while playing a time-sensitive mathematical game. The performances of the algorithms were evaluated by statistically comparing iPPG-based and finger-PPG-based PR and PRV features in terms of Spearman's correlation coefficient, normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis. The study revealed POS and CHROM techniques to be the most robust for PR estimation and the assessment of overall autonomic nervous system (ANS) dynamics by using PRV features in time and frequency domains. Furthermore, we demonstrated that a reliable characterization of the vagal tone is made possible by computing the Poincaré map of PRV series derived from the POS and CHROM methods. This study supports the use of iPPG systems as promising tools to obtain clinically useful and specific information about ANS dynamics.

Indexed as

PhotoplethysmographyWearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsDiagnostic ImagingHeart RateHumansSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedautonomic nervous system (ANS)imaging photoplethysmography (iPPG)pulse rate variability (PRV)remote photoplethysmography

Identifiers

PMID36772543
PMCPMC9919512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.