ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Imitation Learning-Based Performance-Power Trade-Off Uncore Frequency Scaling Policy for Multicore System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the importance of uncore components, such as shared cache slices and memory controllers, increases in processor architecture, the percentage of uncore power consumption in the overall power consumption of multicore processors rises significantly. To maximize the power efficiency of a multicore processor system, we investigate the uncore frequency scaling (UFS) policy and propose a novel imitation learning-based uncore frequency control policy. This policy performs online learning based on the DAgger algorithm and converts the annotation cost of online aggregation data into fine-tuning of the expert model. This design optimizes the online learning efficiency and improves the generality of the UFS policy on unseen loads. On the other hand, we shift our policy optimization target to Performance Per Watt (PPW), i.e., the power efficiency of the processor, to avoid saving a percentage of power while losing a larger percentage of performance. The experimental results show that our proposed policy outperforms the current advanced UFS policy in the benchmark test sequence of SPEC CPU2017. Our policy has a maximum improvement of about 10% relative to the performance-first policies. In the unseen processor load, the tuning decision made by our policy after collecting 50 aggregation data can maintain the processor stably near the optimal power efficiency state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.