Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772482›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Using the Electrocardiogram for Pain Classification under Emotional Contexts.

Pedro Silva, Raquel Sebastião

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pedro SilvaDFis, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Raquel SebastiãoIEETA, DETI, LASI, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5717-1415

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CEECIND/03986/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adequate characterization of pain is critical in diagnosis and therapy selection, and currently is subjectively assessed by patient communication and self-evaluation. Thus, pain recognition and assessment have been a target of study in past years due to the importance of objective measurement. The goal of this work is the analysis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) under emotional contexts and reasoning on the physiological classification of pain under neutral and fear conditions. Using data from both contexts for pain classification, a balanced accuracy of up to 97.4% was obtained. Using an emotionally independent approach and using data from one emotional context to learn pain and data from the other to evaluate the models, a balanced accuracy of up to 97.7% was reached. These similar results seem to support that the physiological response to pain was maintained despite the different emotional contexts. Attempting a participant-independent approach for pain classification and using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy, data from the fear context were used to train pain classification models, and data from the neutral context were used to evaluate the performance, achieving a balanced accuracy of up to 94.9%. Moreover, across the different learning strategies, Random Forest outperformed the remaining models. These results show the feasibility of identifying pain through physiological characteristics of the ECG response despite the presence of autonomic nervous system perturbations.

Indexed as

EmotionsPainElectrocardiographyFearHumansLearningelectrocardiogramemotional contextsmachine learningpainphysiological features

Identifiers

PMID36772482
PMCPMC9919606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.