Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772420›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Reciprocating Arc Silicon Strain Gauges.

Ji-Hoon Han, Sung Joon Min, Joon Hyub Kim, Nam Ki Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ji-Hoon HanKIURI Center for Hydrogen Based Next Generation Mechanical System, Inha University, Incheon 21999, Republic of Korea.
Sung Joon MinDepartment of Stretchable Task Team, LG Display, Seoul 07796, Republic of Korea.
Joon Hyub KimDepartment of Nanomechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea.
Nam Ki MinDepartment of Electro-Mechanical Systems Engineering, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF- 2021M3H1A1064135National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1I1A1A01072763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, silicon-strain-gauge-based diaphragm pressure sensors use four single-gauge chips for high-output sensitivity. However, the four-single-gauge configuration increases the number of glass frit bonds and the number of aluminum wire bonds, reducing the long-term stability, reliability, and yield of the diaphragm pressure sensor. In this study, a new design of general-purpose silicon strain gauges was developed to improve the sensor output voltage while reducing the number of bonds. The new gauges consist grid patterns with a reciprocating arc of silicon piezoresistors on a thin glass backing. The gauges make handling easier in the bonding process due to the use of thin glass for the gauge backing. The pressure sensors were tested under pressure ranging from 0 to 50 bar at five different temperatures, with a linear output with a typical sensitivity of approximately 16 mV/V/bar and an offset shift of -6 mV to 2 mV. The new approach also opens the possibility to extend arc strain gauges to half-bridge and full-bridge configurations to further reduce the number of glass frit and Al wire bonds in the diaphragm pressure sensor.

Indexed as

bulk micromachiningglass frit bondingpressure sensorreciprocating arc strain gaugesteel diaphragm

Identifiers

PMID36772420
PMCPMC9920767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.