Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36772401›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Wearables in Nephrology: Fanciful Gadgetry or Prêt-à-Porter?

Madelena Stauss, Htay Htay, Jeroen P Kooman, Thomas Lindsay, Alexander Woywodt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Madelena StaussDepartment of Nephrology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston PR2 9HT, UK.
Htay HtayDepartment of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore.
Jeroen P KoomanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thomas LindsayDepartment of Nephrology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston PR2 9HT, UK.
Alexander WoywodtDepartment of Nephrology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston PR2 9HT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3825-6955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine and digitalised healthcare have recently seen exponential growth, led, in part, by increasing efforts to improve patient flexibility and autonomy, as well as drivers from financial austerity and concerns over climate change. Nephrology is no exception, and daily innovations are underway to provide digitalised alternatives to current models of healthcare provision. Wearable technology already exists commercially, and advances in nanotechnology and miniaturisation mean interest is also garnering clinically. Here, we outline the current existing wearable technology pertaining to the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with a spectrum of kidney disease, give an overview of wearable dialysis technology, and explore wearables that do not yet exist but would be of great interest. Finally, we discuss challenges and potential pitfalls with utilising wearable technology and the factors associated with successful implementation.

Indexed as

NephrologyTelemedicineWearable Electronic DevicesBiological TransportDelivery of Health CareHumanschronic kidney diseasedialysisnephrologytelemedicinetransplantationwearables

Identifiers

PMID36772401
PMCPMC9919296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.